Saturday, December 30, 2006

Constellation Energy Strategist Group on-site interview Questions

标 题: Constellation Energy Strategist Group on-site interview Questions
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Dec 30 15:49:26 2006)

I spent a super Friday at Constellation’s headquarter at Baltimore with
their strategist groups people. Each of us (candidates) was put in a small
room and 14 people divided in 7 groups rotated and talked to us each for
like 40 minutes.
Try to answer below questions but there is no guarantee.

Q1
A square with four corners A,B,C,D. Suppose you start from corner A and have
equal chance to go to neighboring corners B and D; After reaching new
corner, you again have equal chance to go to its two neighboring corners.
The time consumed to travel on each edge is 1, what is the mean time to come
back to A.
A: Use Binary tree. You will find 50% chance coming back to A at 2n th round
move (thus consume time 2n) from previous round move. So
S=2*(2*1/4+4*1/16+6*1/64+…)=sum(n/2^n) n from 0 to inf.

Q2
Given arbitrary integer, come up with a rule to judge if it is divisible by
9. Prove it.
A: sum up digits of the integer, if sum is more than 10, digits of the sum
again, till you have a single-digit number. If it is 9, then it is divisible
by 9.
Prove: Use induction.
Say you have a number in (100.999) and let it be 100H+10*T+D=99H+9*T+ (H+T+D
), apparently last term (sum of digits) is what we need to prove. It is 3-
digits and true for arbitrary digits.
It is true for 9(n=1, n is number of digits). Then suppose it is true for
arbitrary n, and then prove it is true for n+1.

Q3
What is the properties of p^2-1 where p is prime number larger than 3
A: Divisible by 24. p^2-1=(p+1)(p-1). Consider p-1,p and p+1. They are
consecutive, so one of them is divisible by 3 and it cannot be p. p is odd,
so both p-1 and p+1 are even. Also they are two consecutive even numbers, so
at least one of them is divisible by 4 and the other by 2. Put all together
, the number is divisible is 3*2*4=24

Q4.
There are 100 balls in a bin. Pick one out and number it, then put it back.
Then pick one ball again from bin. If it is numbered already, just put it
back, otherwise number it then put it back. Continue the process till all
balls in the bin are numbered. What is mean numbers of picks needed?
Evaluate the expression numerically.
A: S=100/100+100/99+…..100/1)=100*sum(1/n) n from 1 to 100

Q5.
Evaluate integral of exp(-x^2) from –inf to inf.
A: Expression integrated is similar to Normal distribution PDF, so come out
to be 1 times a factor.

Q6.
There are two targets on a wall. You have n balls. Every time you shoot a
ball on the target, you get $1. Develop a strategy to max your earn.
A: Think of two targets as two circles in a big rectangle (wall). By
symmetry you should center on the line connecting centers of two circles. To
fix a target shooting center, come up with an assumption of the
distribution of landing point of your ball around that center. (ball will
have equal chance to land on circle of certain radius centered around your
target point). Then develop expression of money earned (as function of
distance to center of one target circle), take derivative wrt variable, u
can decide the target point.

Q7.
Given a series X. Find y such that S=sum(abs(xi-y)) is minimized. xi is ith
element of X.
A: S actually is sum of distance of y to all elements of X (1D). So y must
be in (xmin, xmax). And S is constant if X has even number of elements. y
should be median of X if X has odd number of elements.

Q8.
Dice game. One dollar for one point. If you have option to continue to play
second round, what is min points you need to see in order to continue (
expectation of earning with one option). If you have 2nd option to play
third round, what is min point for second round you need to see at 2nd round
((expectation of earning with two options). Program to find mean gain of nth
round game. 一个fair dice掷三次,你有两次机会可以喊停,一旦喊停,色子上给出
几,你就得几块钱。求最佳策略。
A: See “heard on the street”.

Q9.
Roll a penny around another fixed penny in the center with edges in close
contact. After moving half circle around the center penny, you will find the
penny in motion has rotated 360 deg. Why?

Q10.
If a nonhomogenous string can burn and last 30 mins and another string can
last 60 minutes. It is burning at constant rate of materials but not
constant speed since strings are not even along length. How can you time 45
mins.
A: Connect two and burn from both ends.

Q11.
5 Pirates share golden coins problem.

Q12.
A stair of 100 steps. You can either climb either one step or two steps but
no more each time and you can walk up entire stair any way you like with
rule above obeyed. How many possible combinations of ways to finish the walk?
A: Use induction. S(n)=S(n-1)+2*S(n-2). If you finished 99 steps, there is
only one way to finish the last step to finish all 100 steps; If you
finished 98 steps, there are 2 possible ways to finish two remaining steps:
either 1+1 or 2.

Q13.
A very heavy wall moving at 60mph, a ball moving same direction at 120 mph.
What is direction and speed of ball after ball hit wall.
A: Principal of momentum. Ball will move back same speed (as relative speed
before hitting the wall) after hitting relative to wall. Before hitting
relative speed is 60, so after hitting relative speed is -60. Since wall is
moving at 60, so ball will stay still after hitting.

Written questions:
There are 8 questions, 4 for maths and 4 for programming. Need to finish in
1 hour.
Q1. Solve an ODE.
Q2. Given variances and covariance of X and Y. Z=a*X+b*Y. Calc variance of
Z.
Q3. Develop a function to return a list that is inverse order of given
singly linked list.
Q4. Given an array of length m and ask to develop another array containing
average of n consecutive numbers moving rightward in original array with
most efficient algorithm.
A: When calculate moving average of the next n consecutive numbers, you want
to reuse the previous computed moving average. Just multiply that average
by m, minus first number and add a new number, then divide by m again.

Thursday, December 28, 2006

问个统计问题

发信人: AliYoung (老汗~), 信区: Statistics
标 题: 问个统计问题
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Dec 28 09:03:58 2006), 站内

变量z有N个观测数据,且已知z=x+w,w为白噪,均值0,方差R,
现在要估计这一段观测数据的信噪比(\sum x^{2}/\sum w^{2}),
请问有什么好方法?
我用下面的方法看起来是无偏估计,但是好像估计的可信度太差,
SNR的估计=(\sum z^{2}-NR)/NR,
问题:E(SNR的估计-SNR)^{2}的值是多少?即这个估计的方差是多少?

Thursday, December 21, 2006

covariance QR 矩阵

covariance matrix是对称矩阵,用QR分解,逆序相乘可以很快求得近似解
对于很大的矩阵没有必要通过解线性方程得到精确解,可以用收敛比较快的方法得到相
对精确的近似解,比如用matlab的QR函数

a=[.....];

for i=1:10
[q,r]=qr(a);
a=r*q;
end

target = qr(a)


太大的矩阵不知道有效果没。。。

Sunday, December 10, 2006

从《肖申克的救赎》看一个人成功需要的素质zz

发信人: 米兰王朝 (redeem), 信区: movie
标 题: [转载] 从《肖申克的救赎》看一个人成功需要的素质zz
发信站: 两全其美网 (Sat Dec 9 13:13:48 2006), 本站(lqqm.net)

【 以下文字转载自 In70s 讨论区 】
【 原文由 米兰王朝Sat Dec 9 13:13:40 2006 发表 】
发信人: liuxi (帅得想毁容), 信区: Movie
标 题: 从《肖申克的救赎》看一个人成功需要的素质(原创)
发信站: 一塌糊涂 BBS (Tue Jun 1 12:52:45 2004), 本站(ytht.net)

《肖申克的救赎》确实是一部不可多得的好片,看了以后感触良多。很多人都发表了对《肖申克的救赎》的见解,但我有些自己的观点想和大家探讨。
很多人在介绍上都说,安笛是在看到了监狱的黑暗才计划出逃的,我不这么认为。
我认为自安笛一进监狱就没打算“安分守纪”地待着(这我觉得也是这个人物的一
个个性魅力所在),即使安分也是一种无奈。当他看到墙的质地以后,即使还没有
发生后面那些使他绝望的遭遇,他就开始挖洞酝酿出逃了。

电影给我们的启发在于:
1.在极度艰苦绝望环境下的坚强。
当主人公被冤判两个终生监禁,从人生的高峰跌入低谷以后,并没有怨天由人,
只是默默忍受,积蓄力量,等待那个不知何时才能到达的机会。甚至被毒打,
*奸,种种从身体到心灵的折磨。这与我们现实的一些思维不是很相似吗?
现实中很多人都在抱怨,抱怨自己的学历,遭遇,自己的工作。难道我们的情
况比安笛还惨?要知道,成功的前提是坚强和忍耐。

2.培植自己的朋友
主人公进监狱以后,就和red搭上关系,red也很照顾安笛。一起修屋顶就是red搞
来的好差事。当然安笛马上抓助了帮狱警队长继承遗产这件事,回报了red一伙,
使他更加熔入到red一帮人中。他帮了狱警队长,而没有提个人要求,而是请red
他们喝酒这点很值得思考。我们做人的时候,可能为了一点小利益就抛弃了朋友,
这样的人是最傻的。因为你永远也无法知道朋友什么时候能帮上你。而实际上,
帮上按笛的人其实只是red,而且是小忙,那个按笛用来挖洞的锤就是red帮忙搞的。
但是别忘了,没了这个小小的东西,如何才能实现后面的计划?而且重要的是,
没有这些朋友从精神上的支持,他如何度过这些岁月?

3.结识或利用有权的人(这个我自己都觉得这个标题太功利了,但不知道怎么改好、
呵呵)
但是安笛帮忙狱警队长继承遗产,帮狱长洗黑钱,帮监狱里面的警察报税。也不
能说他故意巴结,他要么是被迫,要么是利人利己,搞好关系,自己后来也得到
很多好处。

4.看到机会的存在
人生至少有一次改变你命运的机会,但大部分人却抓不住。这好象是郑渊洁说的。
为什么抓不住,我看还是大部分人看不见那就是个机会。机会蕴藏在小事中。当
安笛在墙上刻字的时候,掉了一块土下来。他马上预料到这是个机会。还有他帮
狱长洗黑钱时,也看到这是机会,才留了一手。我怀疑狱长的黑钱计划是不是安
笛策划的,要不然狱长以前怎么没想到呢?
原来看过一个真实的故事,一个捡易拉罐卖的(名字忘了)。这样的人到处都有
把,一般人就是踩扁,然后卖掉,换点小钱。他就不同,他想这个罐子是什么材
料做的?然后花600块钱到金属研究所化验,得知这是一种比较贵的合金。他就
把别人的易拉罐收来,化成金属块,然后高价卖出,很快就有了好几百万。

5.有预见性,未雨绸缪
安笛开始挖洞时,并没有打算出逃,因为时机还未成熟。他就有先见,
静静等待。也许狱长没叫他洗黑钱,他就没有那么容易出逃。这个时机未来之前,
他等了很多年。有时要问问自己有没有这个先见之明和耐性。机会永远关照有准备的人,
这是千古真理。

这些道理其实大家早就听说过,但还是要佩服这个故事《肖申克的救赎》里面的
主人公,他把这些素质都天衣无缝得发挥出来了。从那种绝望的环境中获得新生。
可以说这个人伟大,体现出了一种真正的强者气息。影片中安笛对red说人始终
要有希望,这对red来说几乎是不敢想的。这简单的话说出了何种的自信,何种
的王者风范,因为他为自己的希望准备了19年。初次看这部片的时候被深深得震
撼了,所感慨的不是上面的什么成功之道,而是一个人的人格魅力,一个看似平凡
的强者。但那种感觉我无法用语言形容。

Wednesday, December 06, 2006

关于面试的一些感触

标 题: 关于面试的一些感触
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Dec 5 17:20:53 2006)

看了waitingGC 的大作,有一些同感。趁着今天有空,
写下一些,希望能够有点帮助。我是搞IT的,有几年经
验,但是这里谈的基本都是比较通用的东西。
我今年换工作,之前已经几年没有认真面试过了。这一
轮面试了不少公司,从大家耳熟能详的,到名不见经传
的,东西两岸的和中部的,纯IT的,传统银行的到IB的
都有。谈了很多家,见到各个级别的人加起来也有好几
十个。到了新公司,又马上被拎出来面试别人。每个星
期电话或者On Site的总有一两个。到现在也见了好
些。老中,老印,老美都有。这样的转换也很有意思,一
个问题两个方面来仔细地看,感触更深一些。

1、充分准备。这包括对技术问题的准备,对对方公司,
小组的了解等等。看似简单,但是到我们这里来面试
的人中充分准备的很少。技术问题本来是大家每天都
搞的,应该没有问题。但越是这样想,越容易有问题,
尤其是有很多经验的。我碰到不止一个,问到概念性
问题回答得很好。最后让他写一段小程序,比如把链
表翻转之类最基本的东西,居然黄了,十几分钟半个
小时写不出来。另外一些被面试的人,连基本的功课
也不做。大大咧咧地问,你们公司是做什么的。你可以
问我们组是做什么,你可以问我最近的项目做什么,
甚至可以说我在网上找过来着,没找到,能不能请你
介绍一些。但是最好不要问对方公司是做什么的。你
既然来面试,就说明你对这个公司感兴趣,你至少到
这个公司的网页上看看About Us。面试就是
dating。你上来对妹妹先说我爱你,然后接着问你
是干啥的。人家不扇你才怪。其实在面试中,你能把
对方公司的情况说得越多,机会越大。招人的宁可招一
个技术弱一点,但是对公司工作兴趣大的,也不会乐意
把offer给一个连我们公司网页也没有时间看的人。
给了offer这人也不一定来,犯不着浪费双方的时间。
2、不卑不亢,积极热情。面试就是dating。你一副臭脸,
人家也不待见。你太谄媚了,人家就容易看不起你。你
如果进入这个公司,同事跟你待的时间并不比跟自己
老婆待的时间短。如果合不来,大家受罪。所以你希望
你的同事是什么样子,你自己最好也作成那样。面试的
过程中,你应当表现出对这个工作有兴趣,人家才知道
你将来会积极面对这些工作。你也犯不着说你对这个
工作方方面面都喜欢得不得了,谁都知道那是撒谎。但
是你至少要表现出对其中的一些部分有兴趣。我面试过
一个人,经验丰富,属于要深度有深度,要广度有广度
的那种。他倒也没有任何架子,只是让我觉得不是很有
热情。我当时觉得这个问题不是我考核的范围,我犯不
着难为他,我就没在这点上吱声。最后果然被HR灭了,
就是这个理由。准备面试的时候,不妨对着镜子自问自
答几个问题,看看自己到底是个什么样子。该改得就
改改。
3、善于听。为什么要搞面试,不直接笔试放榜?要的就是
双向交流。除了尽量向对方展现自己,也要善于从中获
得信息。所以在面试中,不仅仅是把对方的问题回答完
了就了事。要善于把自己的信息有针对性地传递出来。
来面试的很多,真正在这点上smart的很少。对方介绍
情况的时候,脑子别闲着。仔细琢磨有没有跟自己
skill沾边的。如果有,在适当的时候搭两句。如果对
方有兴趣,很可能请你讲讲。一来二去,大家的话匣子就
都打开了。公司请一个人,是希望你能够对公司的成功
有贡献。如果你能让对方知道你的知识经验能够跟对方
的工作联系起来,那就比简单地回答问题进了一大步。
每次我介绍完情况对方一言不发,或者只是礼貌性地附
和一下,我心里就忍不住说:我想帮你美言几句也不知道
说什么。
4、善于问。道理跟上面一样。在听的同时也要问。不要睁着
天真无牙的眼睛乱问。要么让人家听到问题就知道你是
懂行的,要么问出自己想得到信息。工作其实是你最大的
投资之一。你一天睁着眼睛时间,有一多半都投在里面。
干得不开心,或者工作没前途,最后吃亏的都是自己。公
司最多浪费几张pay check。面试是你搞清楚这些问题
的最佳时机。一定要实现列一列自己希望知道信息。找到
机会就问。也可以通过提问,把对方吸引到你自己有话
要说的topic上来。有一次我被面试的时候,对面一个是
Hiring Manager,一个是Architect,真的被我引着
在一些大家都感兴趣我又有点底子的问题上很轻松谈了
很久他们才发现上当了,时间用完了。
5、掌握主动,把自己的长处兜售出来。回答对方的问题是
你赢得胜利的必要不充分条件。有时候甚至连必要条件
也不是。 面试前要想想自己有哪些长处对方会感兴趣。
面试的时候要寻找机会兜售出来。这可以是技术上的强
项,也可以是为人处世方面的长处。以前毕业找工作的
时候,大家交流面试心得,谈到如何对付自己回答不上
的问题时,一个同学说那我就谈我懂的。当时我不以为
然,心想不懂就还是乖乖承认,回来再看书吧。后来慢慢
地才体会到,这才是真知灼见。再牛的人也有不懂的东
西,没有什么大不了的。重要的是要让对方知道你长处
所在。有一次,组里另外一个人告诉我他喜欢一个
candidate,因为他谈到他在工作中如何主动根据用
户提出的问题寻找改进他们系统的地方。这就给人感觉
这人不是被动完成任务,而是能够用脑子的人。尺有所
短,寸有所长。如果能够让对方看到你的长处,即使你有
些方面没有能够达到要求,对方还是会认真考虑的。面
试就是dating。对方如果对你的长处都不感兴趣,那
就是没有缘分,不要也罢。不然你辛苦积累起来的东西
没有用处,对于自己的发展往往不是好事。
6、回答要有条理。
我们经常说某人说话有水平,说起来一套一套的。要的
就是这个效果。懂只是第一步。接下来要说的系统,清
晰有条理。在工作中,不懂可以学。但是如果说都说不
清楚,那就麻烦了。所以在面试中,所有人都会考察你的
沟通技巧。说白了就是说话能不能说清楚。说清楚的关
键就在于条理。比如我喜欢问一些problem solving
的问题。有些说得很干巴。有些人分析起来头头是道:
如何approach这个问题,有那些解决问题的办法,各
有什么利弊,如何根据情况取舍。马上让你觉得这人有
两把刷子,不是来骗饭吃的。
7、从容镇定。正如waitingGC提到的。问得难往往不是刁
难。有些人,往往是老中,喜欢问的很细,容易让人发怵。
要沉住气。这往往就是他的特点,换一个人来面试,他
也会这样。只要他不偏心,他的上司在参考他的意见时也
会注意的。在面试高一些职位尤其是Lead或Manager,
要镇得住,不要太学徒心态。动不动就点头哈腰说我会学。
虚心是好,如果不是很自信,对方就会担心给你个团队你
镇不镇得住。

工夫在平时,多一分准备,多一分机会。
1、有些面试的书还是可以看看的。101 Great Answers
to the Toughest Interview Questions是一本
不错的书,教你如何得体地回答问题。也教你如何问问题。
我看了以后是有点相见恨晚。以前面试太被动了。没有好
好利用机会搜集自己应该搜集的信息。以至于每个工作开
始的时候都是很有热情,慢慢就发现很多问题。这些问题
很多都是能够在面试的时候发现的。这本书里讲了很多
大家通常答不好的软问题,非常有启发。建议找来看看。
2、好好准备技术问题。工作中一个技术往往只用其中一小部
分。面试的时候却要对付整个topic里面的问题。是有一定
跨度的,不要过于自信。要象复习考试一样系统准备。有些
网站,象brainbench,就有很多自测题。可能要收钱。
但是题目多,也很系统。就是有些时候过于细了点。还有很
多免费的网页, Google一下就好了。
3、从周围的人身上学习。三人行必有我师。比方我发现很多
人喜欢背地里骂自己的小老板。不是觉得蠢,就是觉
得他是靠搞政治上去的。其实他既然生存下来就一定有点
本事。在前面的公司里有一个中层,所有他手下的人私下
对他都是劣评如潮:蠢,啥也不懂,在上司面前象哈巴狗,
转过身来压下面的人,等等。我跟他组里的人常喝咖啡,我
也奇怪这样蠢的人怎么生存下来的。骂多了,我也就搞明
白了。他啥也不懂,但他懂得贯彻上面的意思,他总能让手
下的人把上面要的东西捣鼓出来。这叫什么,这叫执行力,
execution。虽然没有vision,作不大,但是上面还是
很赏识他在这个位子上的工作的。这种被大家骂得头臭的
人都有东西可以琢磨,其他就更不用说了。

祝大家都能找好工作,而不只是找到工作。标 题: 关于面试的一些感触
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Dec 5 17:20:53 2006)

看了waitingGC 的大作,有一些同感。趁着今天有空,
写下一些,希望能够有点帮助。我是搞IT的,有几年经
验,但是这里谈的基本都是比较通用的东西。
我今年换工作,之前已经几年没有认真面试过了。这一
轮面试了不少公司,从大家耳熟能详的,到名不见经传
的,东西两岸的和中部的,纯IT的,传统银行的到IB的
都有。谈了很多家,见到各个级别的人加起来也有好几
十个。到了新公司,又马上被拎出来面试别人。每个星
期电话或者On Site的总有一两个。到现在也见了好
些。老中,老印,老美都有。这样的转换也很有意思,一
个问题两个方面来仔细地看,感触更深一些。

1、充分准备。这包括对技术问题的准备,对对方公司,
小组的了解等等。看似简单,但是到我们这里来面试
的人中充分准备的很少。技术问题本来是大家每天都
搞的,应该没有问题。但越是这样想,越容易有问题,
尤其是有很多经验的。我碰到不止一个,问到概念性
问题回答得很好。最后让他写一段小程序,比如把链
表翻转之类最基本的东西,居然黄了,十几分钟半个
小时写不出来。另外一些被面试的人,连基本的功课
也不做。大大咧咧地问,你们公司是做什么的。你可以
问我们组是做什么,你可以问我最近的项目做什么,
甚至可以说我在网上找过来着,没找到,能不能请你
介绍一些。但是最好不要问对方公司是做什么的。你
既然来面试,就说明你对这个公司感兴趣,你至少到
这个公司的网页上看看About Us。面试就是
dating。你上来对妹妹先说我爱你,然后接着问你
是干啥的。人家不扇你才怪。其实在面试中,你能把
对方公司的情况说得越多,机会越大。招人的宁可招一
个技术弱一点,但是对公司工作兴趣大的,也不会乐意
把offer给一个连我们公司网页也没有时间看的人。
给了offer这人也不一定来,犯不着浪费双方的时间。
2、不卑不亢,积极热情。面试就是dating。你一副臭脸,
人家也不待见。你太谄媚了,人家就容易看不起你。你
如果进入这个公司,同事跟你待的时间并不比跟自己
老婆待的时间短。如果合不来,大家受罪。所以你希望
你的同事是什么样子,你自己最好也作成那样。面试的
过程中,你应当表现出对这个工作有兴趣,人家才知道
你将来会积极面对这些工作。你也犯不着说你对这个
工作方方面面都喜欢得不得了,谁都知道那是撒谎。但
是你至少要表现出对其中的一些部分有兴趣。我面试过
一个人,经验丰富,属于要深度有深度,要广度有广度
的那种。他倒也没有任何架子,只是让我觉得不是很有
热情。我当时觉得这个问题不是我考核的范围,我犯不
着难为他,我就没在这点上吱声。最后果然被HR灭了,
就是这个理由。准备面试的时候,不妨对着镜子自问自
答几个问题,看看自己到底是个什么样子。该改得就
改改。
3、善于听。为什么要搞面试,不直接笔试放榜?要的就是
双向交流。除了尽量向对方展现自己,也要善于从中获
得信息。所以在面试中,不仅仅是把对方的问题回答完
了就了事。要善于把自己的信息有针对性地传递出来。
来面试的很多,真正在这点上smart的很少。对方介绍
情况的时候,脑子别闲着。仔细琢磨有没有跟自己
skill沾边的。如果有,在适当的时候搭两句。如果对
方有兴趣,很可能请你讲讲。一来二去,大家的话匣子就
都打开了。公司请一个人,是希望你能够对公司的成功
有贡献。如果你能让对方知道你的知识经验能够跟对方
的工作联系起来,那就比简单地回答问题进了一大步。
每次我介绍完情况对方一言不发,或者只是礼貌性地附
和一下,我心里就忍不住说:我想帮你美言几句也不知道
说什么。
4、善于问。道理跟上面一样。在听的同时也要问。不要睁着
天真无牙的眼睛乱问。要么让人家听到问题就知道你是
懂行的,要么问出自己想得到信息。工作其实是你最大的
投资之一。你一天睁着眼睛时间,有一多半都投在里面。
干得不开心,或者工作没前途,最后吃亏的都是自己。公
司最多浪费几张pay check。面试是你搞清楚这些问题
的最佳时机。一定要实现列一列自己希望知道信息。找到
机会就问。也可以通过提问,把对方吸引到你自己有话
要说的topic上来。有一次我被面试的时候,对面一个是
Hiring Manager,一个是Architect,真的被我引着
在一些大家都感兴趣我又有点底子的问题上很轻松谈了
很久他们才发现上当了,时间用完了。
5、掌握主动,把自己的长处兜售出来。回答对方的问题是
你赢得胜利的必要不充分条件。有时候甚至连必要条件
也不是。 面试前要想想自己有哪些长处对方会感兴趣。
面试的时候要寻找机会兜售出来。这可以是技术上的强
项,也可以是为人处世方面的长处。以前毕业找工作的
时候,大家交流面试心得,谈到如何对付自己回答不上
的问题时,一个同学说那我就谈我懂的。当时我不以为
然,心想不懂就还是乖乖承认,回来再看书吧。后来慢慢
地才体会到,这才是真知灼见。再牛的人也有不懂的东
西,没有什么大不了的。重要的是要让对方知道你长处
所在。有一次,组里另外一个人告诉我他喜欢一个
candidate,因为他谈到他在工作中如何主动根据用
户提出的问题寻找改进他们系统的地方。这就给人感觉
这人不是被动完成任务,而是能够用脑子的人。尺有所
短,寸有所长。如果能够让对方看到你的长处,即使你有
些方面没有能够达到要求,对方还是会认真考虑的。面
试就是dating。对方如果对你的长处都不感兴趣,那
就是没有缘分,不要也罢。不然你辛苦积累起来的东西
没有用处,对于自己的发展往往不是好事。
6、回答要有条理。
我们经常说某人说话有水平,说起来一套一套的。要的
就是这个效果。懂只是第一步。接下来要说的系统,清
晰有条理。在工作中,不懂可以学。但是如果说都说不
清楚,那就麻烦了。所以在面试中,所有人都会考察你的
沟通技巧。说白了就是说话能不能说清楚。说清楚的关
键就在于条理。比如我喜欢问一些problem solving
的问题。有些说得很干巴。有些人分析起来头头是道:
如何approach这个问题,有那些解决问题的办法,各
有什么利弊,如何根据情况取舍。马上让你觉得这人有
两把刷子,不是来骗饭吃的。
7、从容镇定。正如waitingGC提到的。问得难往往不是刁
难。有些人,往往是老中,喜欢问的很细,容易让人发怵。
要沉住气。这往往就是他的特点,换一个人来面试,他
也会这样。只要他不偏心,他的上司在参考他的意见时也
会注意的。在面试高一些职位尤其是Lead或Manager,
要镇得住,不要太学徒心态。动不动就点头哈腰说我会学。
虚心是好,如果不是很自信,对方就会担心给你个团队你
镇不镇得住。

工夫在平时,多一分准备,多一分机会。
1、有些面试的书还是可以看看的。101 Great Answers
to the Toughest Interview Questions是一本
不错的书,教你如何得体地回答问题。也教你如何问问题。
我看了以后是有点相见恨晚。以前面试太被动了。没有好
好利用机会搜集自己应该搜集的信息。以至于每个工作开
始的时候都是很有热情,慢慢就发现很多问题。这些问题
很多都是能够在面试的时候发现的。这本书里讲了很多
大家通常答不好的软问题,非常有启发。建议找来看看。
2、好好准备技术问题。工作中一个技术往往只用其中一小部
分。面试的时候却要对付整个topic里面的问题。是有一定
跨度的,不要过于自信。要象复习考试一样系统准备。有些
网站,象brainbench,就有很多自测题。可能要收钱。
但是题目多,也很系统。就是有些时候过于细了点。还有很
多免费的网页, Google一下就好了。
3、从周围的人身上学习。三人行必有我师。比方我发现很多
人喜欢背地里骂自己的小老板。不是觉得蠢,就是觉
得他是靠搞政治上去的。其实他既然生存下来就一定有点
本事。在前面的公司里有一个中层,所有他手下的人私下
对他都是劣评如潮:蠢,啥也不懂,在上司面前象哈巴狗,
转过身来压下面的人,等等。我跟他组里的人常喝咖啡,我
也奇怪这样蠢的人怎么生存下来的。骂多了,我也就搞明
白了。他啥也不懂,但他懂得贯彻上面的意思,他总能让手
下的人把上面要的东西捣鼓出来。这叫什么,这叫执行力,
execution。虽然没有vision,作不大,但是上面还是
很赏识他在这个位子上的工作的。这种被大家骂得头臭的
人都有东西可以琢磨,其他就更不用说了。

祝大家都能找好工作,而不只是找到工作。

Tuesday, December 05, 2006

Quant面试问题

发信人: luoge (纯净水), 信区: Quant
标 题: Quant面试问题
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Dec 4 20:23:29 2006)

今天拿到了口头offer, 在quant版学习了不少东西,也希望贡献一点力量,所以把记得
的面试问题写出来。祝大家都找到满意的工作。

I got all the questions in interviews. I am trying to make all answers/hints
accurate but can not guarantee.

Brainteasers

1. a normal dice with 6 sides with numbers from 1 to 6, toss it at most
three time. After each toss, you get a number x, you can either continue or
get x dollars. What is the game worth?

2. the same rule as question 1, What would you like to pay to play the game?

3. a coin, toss a number times until you get a head, say N. You will get
paid with 2^N, what is the game worth?

4. The same rule as question 2, what would you like to pay to play the game?

5. three pieces of pizzas, 1 with both sides burned, 1 with 1 side burned, 1
with 0 side burned. Stack them together blindly, you see the top surface is
burned, what is the probabilty for the other side of the top pizza being
burned?

6. a normal dice, two players, X and Y. X starts tossing the coin first, if
a
6 is shown, the game stops and X wins, otherwise, Y tosses and so on. What
is the probability for x to win?

7. A pile of 1000 stones, split it to two piles x and y, you get a number xy
. Split x and y further, you a number for each of them. repeat the process
until there are 1000 piles of 1 stone, add all the numbers together, what is
the sum? Why do you always get the same answer even your splitting is
arbitrary?

8. A string of length 1, cut it to two strings of length x and y, you get a
number xy. Then you do similar splitting and add all the numbers up. what is
the limit of the sum?

9. couples shaking hands, forget details, please google.

10. answer this question in 10 sec: a ball with a radius 2 weighs 80 ouces,
how much does a ball with a radius 3 weigh?

11. There are 100 statements, the nth statement says: among the 100
statement, at most (n-1) are true. How may are true?

math

1. what is the distance from the origin to the surface 2x+3y+4z=12?
2. what is i^i
3. If x is a gaussian variable N(0,1), what is E{x^n}
4. What is type I and II errors? what is the power of test? Central limit
theorem, estimator theory.
5. what makes a valid correlation matrix?
6. how to generate correlated random walk series?
7. What schemes to solve PDEs?
8. What is Quasi-random number and why?
9. do you know how to find minimum value of a function?
10. what is monte carlo simulation/integration?
11. 50

C++/algorithm

what is virtual function/inheritance, public/private/protected member/
inheritance, static member/function, dynamic/static cast, template?
STL quesitons: how to use sort, map? How to implement map idea with vector?
what is an initializatoin list and in what situation such an list must be
provided
what is design pattern, any examples?
how to sort an array? the order of complexity.
how to define a tree and vist all elements of the tree?

finance
1. an vanilla bond has a positive convexity, what security may have a
negative convexity?
2. what is the distribution of correlation coefficient of two random stocks
like?
3. how many stocks should be appropriate in a portfolio?
4. how to ensure that your portfolio has a 60% probability of having a
return >10%
5. time-series: what is ar/ma/arch/garch, why? how to test non-constant
volatility


behavioal

Give an example to illustrate how to deal with deadline/bad collaborator/bad
project/mistake and so on.

answers or hints

Brainteasers

1. work backwards, like an american option, get asked about this question
serveral times, this seems a must-ask question for interviewers.
2. if you are risk-neutral, you get the same answer as in 1, not otherwise.
3. Infinity
4. if you are risk-neutral, you get the same answer as in 3, not otherwise.
5. 2/3
6. 6/11
7. 1000*999/2
8. 1/2, use geometrical method, xy is like area of a square.
10. 270 ouces

math
1. get the normal vector to the surface or minimize x^2+y^2+z^2
2. write the base i as e^(2N*Pi+1/2*pi)
3. use moment-generating function and do taylor expansion
4. consult a statistics book.
5. symmetrical semi-definit
6. Chelosky decomposition or diagnalization
7-10 see numerical recipe


C++/algorithm

All C++ questions can be answered by reading Stroustrup's book except design
pattern, for which you need google
sort: know at least 3 sorting algorthm and say how it works
tree: pre-order, post-order

finance
1. callable bond
2. positive skewed
3. ~200? not sure
4. no idea

Saturday, December 02, 2006

Investment framework with a buzz

Investment framework with a buzz

By Kate Burgess

Published: November 6 2006 02:00 | Last updated: November 6 2006 02:00

A couple of years ago, it would have been hard to find anyone in the UK's financial services industry muttering "liability driven investment". Now everyone is at it. LDI, as it is known, has become a buzzword for pension fund managers and trustees, investment banks and investment consultancies.

Most companies involved in UK pensions are offering clients access to LDI in some form of product or service.

ADVERTISEMENT

In essence, LDI is an investment framework that seeks to match, wholly or in part, pension fund assets to the promises made to employees and pensioners.

In most cases, it involves some use of swaps and derivatives to hedge out the risks such as changes in inflation and interest rates that can eat into a pension scheme's ability to keep these promises.

Exponents of LDI say the need for a new approach became acute after a combination of falling equity markets and changes to the accounting rules on pension funds crystallised big and volatile gaps between equity-dominated portfolios of assets and pension plans' liabilities. The industry, it emerged, had been focusing on matching the performance of peers or a benchmark without close reference to liabilities.

And low inflation and low interest rates meant there was little hope of the value of assets ever catching up - as managers had hoped - with these liabilities. Meanwhile, the UK's new Pension Regulator made it clear he wanted companies to clear these deficits within 10 years.

At first, LDI was a popular term bandied around at conferences with few funds actually adopting it. But a report last month by consultants Hymans Robertson said in the past six months LDI was "beginning to gain traction". It forecast a 20 per cent increase in LDI business by 2010.

Interest is also growing in the US where the Financial Accounting Standards Board now requires companies to value pension fund deficits on balance sheets by December in much the same way that UK companies do. A survey last year by JP Morgan Asset Management found that half of US retirement plans view the need to hedge against swings in liabilities as a reason to change investment strategies.

Leaders in the field of LDI, such as Barclays Global Investors, State Street, Legal & General and Insight, have spent millions developing new products and services, channelling resources to building LDI expertise, recruiting investment consultants and bankers, and bringing in experts on derivatives and alternatives sometimes at the expense of mainstream equityanalysis.

As more product providers enter the fray, the meaning of LDI is expanding and blurring.

At one extreme, LDI is interchangeable with liability-matching, where managers try to replicate the cash flows needed to pay benefits. This involves buying a series of fixed-income bonds or using interest rate and inflation swaps.

The industry argues, though, that LDI is a long-term investment discipline looking at risk in new ways and placing a plan's liabilities at the heart of the investment process.

Things have moved on since WH Smith pension fund - a pioneer of LDI - last year switched almost its entire investment portfolio into swap contracts designed to last 50 years with Goldman Sachs. The company's and trustees' goal was to eliminate all the risks posed by interest rates, inflation and stock markets that might endanger the scheme's ability to pay its pension promises. WH Smith kept only a small proportion of the fund in equity call options.

However, this is too expensive a process for most companies.

Switching to bonds and swaps locks funds into low-return assets that limit funds' flexibility should markets change. They also lock company sponsors into paying higher contributions to make up for the lower-risk/lower-returnprofile of the assets. WH Smith agreed pension contributions of £52m over three years to shore up the pension fund deficit.

Increasingly, therefore, pension fund trustees and sponsoring companies have turned to a model of LDI that has fixed income and swaps on the one side with a high-return portfolio on the other designed to deliver above-market returns to help funds close their pension deficits.

The likes of Schroders and BGI's strategic solutions group claim their aim is to restructure portfolios with a clear risk budget, replacing unintentional risks that are not properly rewarded with a range of risks across different asset classes that are properly rewarded.

Mercer Investment Consulting estimates that "one in 10 UK pension funds will consider introducing some kind of liability benchmarked strategy, split equally between those implementing a passively managed swap strategy (either an overlay strategy or in place of traditional bond mandates) and those implementing actively managed liability benchmarked strategies, or 'LDI plus'-typemandates".

BGI has about 40 clients with about £25bn in assets using LDI strategies and not one of them is the same, says Andy Hunt, senior strategist in LDI at BGI. Last year more than 125 funds made inquiries about LDI.

Inevitably, the explosion of LDI products is fostering a certain level of cynicism with observers who worry that LDI brings with it a new set of risks. Changes to assumptions on longevity, for example, will put tremendous strains on the model. So, too, will a sudden shift in interest rate or inflation expectations. It is important that funds keep some kind of exposure to assets that can deliver some kind of capital appreciation over the longer term, they say.

But despite these anxieties, LDI is here to stay, says Mr Hunt. "LDI is not a cottage industry any more. It has become mainstream."

Thursday, November 30, 2006

Rolling in it

Hedge funds

Rolling in it

Nov 16th 2006
From The Economist print edition

Why investors should kick up a fuss about hedge-fund fees

bluegreenpictures

THERE is an old Wall Street story that can be adapted for the modern world of hedge funds. A young hedge-fund trainee is taken to the harbour. “Here”, says his boss, “are the partners' yachts. And over there are the yachts of the bankers who lend to us.” The naive youth replies: “But where are the customers' yachts?”

Recent weeks have shown how alluring a berth on that bounteous marina is. Morgan Stanley, a big investment bank, has bought stakes in three groups, Avenue Capital, FrontPoint Partners and Lansdowne, at a total cost believed to be more than $1 billion. Two former American treasury secretaries, Larry Summers and John Snow, have discovered hedge-fund lucre, as has another former Washingtonian, Chelsea Clinton, the ex-president's daughter. In the hope of tapping new sources of capital, Fortress Investment Group, which offers both hedge funds and private equity, has announced plans to float 10% of itself on America's stockmarket. Marshall Wace, a British manager, has launched a €1.5 billion ($1.9 billion) hedge fund on the Euronext exchange in Amsterdam.

But the flurry of activity raises two big questions. First, everyone knows that hedge-fund managers are rolling in it; some made more than $1 billion last year. Investment banks also earn a big slug of their income from lending to, and trading for, hedge funds. Most new investors back the sector via funds-of-funds, which collect a second layer of fees. If industry insiders make so much from the industry, can that leave anything for the clients? Where are their yachts?

Second, if investment banks are buying or launching hedge funds, the sector itself is expanding into loan-making and private equity, and mutual funds are adopting hedge-fund techniques, is there any sense in talking of a separate hedge-fund industry any more? Asset management, once so tribal, is becoming a giant melting-pot.

The long and the short of it

Already it is fiendishly hard to define a hedge fund. At best, one can outline a few key characteristics. Hedge funds are private pools of capital that are lightly regulated, often borrow to enhance returns and are partly paid on the basis of performance. The term “hedge” (from hedging your bets) derives from the aim of making money whether a market goes up or down. This ability to bet on falling prices (“going short”) distinguishes them from traditional “long-only” funds, which profit only if prices rise.

Enthusiasts say the greater variety of tools at their disposal gives them an edge. Stanley Fink of Man Investments, one of the largest hedge-fund groups, uses the analogy of having a full range of golf clubs rather than just one.

That flexibility appeals to pension funds. In the 1990s, many pension funds made far too big a bet on equities, a gamble that went disastrously wrong in the 2000-02 bear market. As pension funds sank into deficit, they started looking for alternative sources of return.

Hence the astonishing growth of hedge funds. In 1990, according to estimates by Hedge Fund Research (HFR), a data provider, there were just 610 funds controlling some $39 billion of assets. By 2000 there were 3,873 funds with $490 billion. The latest estimate is over 9,000 funds, with $1.3 trillion at their disposal.

Moving into hedge funds has been part of a deliberate diversification into “alternative assets”, a category that includes property, commodities and private-equity investment. Mark Anson, chief executive of Hermes, a British group that manages pension assets for BT, a telecoms operator, says hedge funds offer a source of return that does not necessarily move in step with share and bond markets.

A genuinely diversified source of return is the one “free lunch” available from the investment world. If it can be found, it will improve the trade-off between risk and return. That is why investors are willing to pay the high fees (often 2% annually plus a fifth of all profits) that hedge funds charge.

And the hedge funds have done a good job of protecting investors. The worst year for the sector, according to HFR, was 2002, when the index fell 1.5%; there has been only one month since 1990 when the sector lost more than 3.5%.

But Narayan Naik of the London Business School gives warning that hedge funds might be more closely correlated with other investments then they appear to be. He says pension funds have been advised to move into hedge funds by consultants, who are impressed by hedge funds' favourable risk-return trade-offs.

The problem, says Mr Naik, is that the consultants had to rely on past data. And those were very flattering. During the 1990s, most asset prices soared. The industry was dominated by “global macro” managers such as George Soros who took big bets on currencies and stockmarkets, using borrowed money. Measured returns for the sector were boosted by survivor bias: failed funds ceased to be counted in the indices.

In recent years, returns have been much less impressive (see chart). In the 1990s, the compound annual return from HFR's composite index was 18.3%; since 2000, that return has been just 7.5%. Not surprisingly, that has disappointed some investors. A global survey by Mercer Investment Consulting found that only 23% of pension funds were satisfied with their fund-of-hedge-funds investments.

Alpha pay for beta performance

Of course, it has been much more difficult to make money in markets since the dotcom bubble burst in 2000. But that only shows hedge-fund returns are not just dependent on skill (“alpha”, in the jargon) but on general market movements (“beta”). Mr Naik says that hedge-fund returns have been increasingly based on beta in recent years. Hedge-fund managers have every incentive to take this route, since they take a percentage of all profits, however they are derived. But beta can be obtained at very low cost via index-tracking funds. Why pay hedge-fund prices?

The smart (or big) money has already responded to these problems. ABP of the Netherlands is the largest pension fund in Europe with €200 billion of assets. Edwina Neal, its chief investment officer, says the group has around 3% of its investments in hedge funds, making it one of the industry's biggest backers. That power gives ABP the ability to place greater emphasis on performance, to control fees and to insist on hurdle rates before paying them. ABP also looks for specialist hedge funds whose returns are not closely related to the rest of its portfolio.

Such investments might seem to be an example of a “free lunch”. But can everyone dine from this table? Uncorrelated hedge funds tend to have niche strategies and there is a limit to the amount they can invest. Too much money tends to dilute returns, as happened to one sector (convertible arbitrage) in 2005. Furthermore, niche strategies tend to invest in illiquid assets, such as exotic options. Assets of this sort appear to move differently from mainstream shares and bonds because their price moves infrequently. But when bad news hits stockmarkets, illiquid assets can be hit extremely hard. Correlations increase substantially.

Hedge-fund managers are well aware of the limits of specialising in niche products. Some simply close to new investors after reaching their target for funds under management. But others want to keep growing. A number develop private-equity or banking characteristics, by providing capital directly to companies or making loans. Some are diversifying into multi-strategy funds, which invest across a range of sectors. Others have started long-only funds, thereby opening up a much bigger market. As Peter Harrison of MPC investors, a fund manager, says: “There's $1 trillion or so in hedge funds but $90 trillion of long-only money and that's the big prize.”

While hedge funds are expanding, traditional groups are moving into their territory, too. Some, like Morgan Stanley, are doing so by acquisition; others, such as Barclays Global Investors and Gartmore, have built up in-house franchises. A change in mutual-fund rules applicable across the EU, known as UCITS III, has meant that hedge-fund practices are also available to retail investors. Products known as 130/30 funds (which can go 130% long and 30% short) offer some of the flexibility of a hedge fund—albeit with some of the fees, too. So it may well be that the increasingly blurry distinction between hedge-fund managers and less racy traditional managers will become obsolete. “In three to four years' time, we may not be talking about hedge funds as an element of the portfolio but about putting money into equities and then backing good managers, however they operate,” remarks Nadja Pinnavaia of Goldman Sachs Asset Management.

As the industry matures, it is becoming more concentrated. Hedge Fund Intelligence, a data provider, reckons the top 20 funds control a third of the industry's assets. The funds of funds, such as those at Man Group and UBS, are the largest. Among the direct managers, HFI says there are four American groups with more than $20 billion of hedge-fund assets (Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Bridgewater and D.E. Shaw) and another four with over $15 billion (Farallon Capital Management, Och-Ziff Capital, Barclays Global Investors and ESL Investments).

The growing power of the most popular hedge-fund managers means some are extending the initial lock-up and notice periods before investors can withdraw their money. This might be fine until disaster strikes. And disasters do happen—such as the recent 65% loss in one month by Amaranth Advisors, a Connecticut-based hedge fund whose top trader gambled on natural-gas prices. But the image of hedge funds as a high-stakes casino is rather unfair; most hedge funds quietly give up through lack of interest rather than collapsing spectacularly.

Hedge funds may have acted to stabilise markets by increasing liquidity and by betting on both falling and rising prices. It is surely no coincidence that the recent low volatility of equity, bond and currency markets has coincided with hedge funds' explosive growth.

Hedge funds' boosters and detractors both exaggerate. Hedge funds are not the panacea for every pension-fund deficit, nor are they the cause of every ill in the financial markets. They are like a fast-growing adolescent, sometimes boisterous, sometimes clumsy but still developing. Where skill does exist, clients will probably find that managers get the bulk of the benefits. But as long as clients blindly believe in that skill, they will pay for the hedge funds' yachts.

Monday, November 27, 2006

Business this week

Business this week

Nov 23rd 2006
From The Economist print edition

The London Stock Exchange rejected a second takeover bid by the American NASDAQ exchange. The LSE said the new £2.7 billion ($5.1 billion) offer still “substantially” undervalued it, and spurned a proposal for further talks. After NASDAQ revealed it had increased its stake in the LSE to almost 29%, attention turned to the Americans' chances of getting the LSE's biggest investors to support their offer. See article

Tributes were paid to Milton Friedman, who died on November 16th, aged 94. The American economist, a champion of free markets, laid the intellectual foundations for the ending of the post-war Keynesian consensus. Mr Friedman urged governments to cut spending and privatise state services, but gave warning that “Hell hath no fury like a bureaucrat scorned.”

America's treasury secretary, Hank Paulson, gave a speech in which he called for balance in regulatory oversight of capital markets. Mr Paulson said that legislation should not be “excessive” or impose “needless costs”, but he stopped short of calling for an overhaul of Sarbanes-Oxley rules, which critics say are intrusive. See article

A long-running TV drama?

A fight broke out for control of ITV, Britain's biggest commercial broadcaster. BSkyB, a pay-TV channel that is part of Rupert Murdoch's empire, bought a 17.9% stake in ITV, which was interpreted as an attempt to stymie a £4.7 billion ($8.9 billion) merger bid from NTL, a cable and phone operator in which Sir Richard Branson is the largest shareholder. Sir Richard called on regulators to intervene in what he fumed was BSkyB's “blatant attempt to distort competition”, but ITV rejected NTL's offer as too low. See article

In a significant step towards an accommodation between newspapers and internet companies in lucrative classified advertising, several firms representing 176 newspapers in America reached a partnership with Yahoo! to share content and advertising online.

Google's share price continued to rise and pushed past $500 for the first time. The share price has gone up by around 40% since February, when investors took fright at negative reports about future growth. Google now has a market capitalisation of some $155 billion, more than eight times that of General Motors.

General Motors' share price came under pressure as it emerged that Kirk Kerkorian has cut his stake to 7.4% from 9.9%. Mr Kerkorian recently failed to persuade GM to create an alliance with Renault and Nissan and remains critical of GM's own blueprint to restructure its business.

Buy, buy, buy!

Hot on the heels of last week's $26.7 billion agreement to buy out Clear Channel Communications, a radio and outdoor-advertising company, the rush for big private-equity deals continued. In the largest-ever leveraged buy-out, Blackstone continued its property-acquisition spree by offering $36 billion for Equity Office Properties, America's biggest real-estate investment trust. It also emerged that Australia's Qantas Airways had been approached about a potential buy-out, said to value the airline at around A$11 billion ($8.5 billion). See article

Mining and metals firms also had an acquisitive week. Freeport-McMoRan secured a $25.9 billion deal for Phelps Dodge, a bigger mining rival which failed to cement an ambitious three-way merger with Inco and Falconbridge earlier this year. And in the largest investment by a Russian firm in America, Evraz, a steel group controlled by a Russian oligarch, Roman Abramovich, said it was buying Oregon Steel Mills for $2.3 billion.

CSN, a Brazilian steelmaker, approached Corus, an Anglo-Dutch rival, about a takeover. The move puts pressure on India's Tata Steel to raise its recent offer for Corus. See article

The planned merger between Gaz de France and Suez was thrown into doubt again when the French courts said the deal could not be completed until workers facing privatisation at GDF had had more time to consider the agreement. The combination of the two utilities has been mired in controversy since the French government unveiled the plan in February.

Markets responded positively as the Ifo institute's index of German business confidence, seen as an indication of future growth in the euro area, reached a 15-year high.

Sinking economic foundations

Construction started on new homes in America at an annual rate of 1.49m in October, the lowest level for six years. The rate was 27% below October 2005—the biggest year-on-year decline since March 1991 (the housing market's slump has been blamed for weak growth in the third quarter). Meanwhile, the White House lowered its GDP growth forecast for 2007 to 2.9%.

Place red balls

现有50个红球,50个黑球,还有两个空桶。现在把这些球放到两个空桶里面。一个
人,随机的从任一个桶中拿一个球出来,问怎么放这些球,使得他拿出红球的概率最大
。此人完全不知道桶里面球的分布。如果一个桶是空的,那么他肯定是拿不出红球的。
(提示:考虑比较极端的情况)

pistol brain teaser

某银行面世我时, INTERVIEWR (老印, 很NICE)我以下一个问题, 至今不明白我错了:
一歹徒持一有2发子弹(2子弹紧挨)的手枪, 其CHAMBER为圆形,具有6个腔。歹徒刚用
向某人开了一枪,被射击者侥幸逃得一命因为此时腔中无子弹。现歹徒顶住你的头,给
你两个选择:
1)接过枪草自己开一枪;
2)Randomize Chamber, then shoot yourself
问:何种情况你的存活率高?
谢谢!!
我选了(2)

should be (1)
set x = 1, or 0.

set P(x = 1|x = 0) = p(x=0|x=1)*p(x=1)/p(x=0) = 5/6*1/3/(2/3) = 5/12
obviously in (2) P =2/6 = 1/3

Up to here, the conclusion is obvious: (2) is better cause we have less probability of shotting a
bullet.

But that's not the answer: cause p(x=0|x=1) is not like 5/6. It is c(6, 2) = 1/2. So the P(x=1|x=0) = 1/2*1/3/(2/3) = 1/4

So the answer is (1)

Sunday, November 26, 2006

ABN Amro to invest €100m in hedge fund

ABN Amro to invest €100m in hedge fund

By James Mackintosh in London

Published: November 26 2006 21:18 | Last updated: November 26 2006 21:18

ABN Amro is set to invest as much as €100m ($131m) in a new listed hedge fund managed by Marshall Wace. The Dutch bank joins Deutsche Bank and Merrill Lynch as core shareholders of the €1.5bn MW Tops.

The new fund from the London manager is proving popular and is expected to be fully subscribed today or tomorrow, according to people familiar with the situation.

ADVERTISEMENT

Deutsche and Merrill have both committed to buy 9.9 per cent, with Merrill capping its investment at €120m. All three of the big banks – two of which are also bookrunners for the flotation – would see their investments cut back if the fund is more than fully subscribed by its IPO date of December 8.

The planned investment by ABN, which is expected to be approved this week, demonstrates the premium major banks are putting on access to hedge funds they can sell on to wealthy customers through their private banks and brokerages.

Several big banks, most recently led by Morgan Stanley, have spent hundreds of millions of dollars buying minority stakes in hedge fund managers in an attempt to secure preferential access to their funds.

ABN and Marshall Wace declined to comment.

The listing of MW Tops on Euronext in Amsterdam is being closely followed by many hedge funds and investment banks who hope to follow it with a series of new funds.

“Everybody is looking at Marshall Wace to see whether it is a success or not,” said Robin Bowie, chairman of Dexion Capital, which runs several London-listed funds of hedge funds.

The test is likely to be not just the capital raised but whether, like the $5bn Kohlberg Kravis Roberts private equity fund listed earlier this year, MW Tops falls to a discount to its net asset value.

The company has been structured carefully in an attempt to avoid discounts, but Mr Bowie and bankers working on the IPO said it would be hard for other hedge funds to follow suit, partly because of the need to continue to market the listed vehicle to investors in the secondary market.

“Everybody and their brother want to meet to discuss this,” said one banker. “But it is still going to be tricky for single manager funds that rely entirely upon very bright people with a hot hand.”

If they come, further single-strategy funds are likely to be listed on Euronext rather than London thanks to regulatory restrictions.

“Euronext has stolen a march on the LSE [London Stock Exchange] because the LSE has not been flexible enough in allowing single managers to come to market,” Mr Bowie said.

The Financial Services Authority hastily reversed a planned rule change two weeks ago in an attempt to attract more alternative listed funds, such as single manager hedge funds and private equity, but they cannot hold a primary listing, only a secondary listing.

The FSA will shortly consult on changing the rules for primary listings.

Rich try sly moves to join hedge funds

It looks HFs are really hot recently, rich investors are tryting anyways to put their money in-what a fucking funny world.

Rich try sly moves to join hedge funds

By James Mackintosh in London

Published: November 26 2006 22:10 | Last updated: November 26 2006 22:10

With enough money, a private jet and a house in the Hamptons are easy enough to acquire, but wealthy investors are finding they have to resort to devious tactics to get the latest must-have: a stake in the world’s best hedge funds.

The flood of money pouring into the hedge fund industry has seen the best fund managers shut their doors to new money.

ADVERTISEMENT

Some of the industry’s biggest names – Stevie Cohen of SAC Capital, Paul Tudor Jones of Tudor Investments, Louis Bacon of Moore Capital, Steve Mandel of Lone Pine Capital and many others – do not need to expand further and often believe more cash would hurt their returns.

“The reality is that it is only a tiny number of hedge funds that are any good and of those an increasing number are either limiting inflows completely or have the luxury of deciding who their investors will be,” says Mark James, director of alternative investments at ABN Amro.

Some wealthy investors are so keen to get a foot in the door they are taking sly steps to get their cash into so-called “closed” funds. Several funds have seen well-off individuals transfer money to their depository bank, triggering automatic issuance of units in the fund, even though they were not wanted.

“It is incredibly annoying,” says one London fund manager who has been closed for several years. “People are quite flabbergasted, especially very wealthy people, when you send their money back.”

Most of the tactics used by investors are less underhand. Big institutions know closed hedge fund managers often accept money from longstanding clients, friends, “good” investors and charity funds. Even the toughest fund manager is likely to replace redemptions, operating a wait list for these investment chances.

But investors still find it hard get on such lists.

Some funds of hedge funds believe they can get a foot in the door through their relationships.

London’s GAM backs a lot of new funds, and uses that early connection to get extra money in later. The $27bn Permal, the oldest surviving fund of hedge funds, believes its sheer size gives it an advantage in securing a position on the wait list.

But Omar Kodmani, senior executive officer at Permal, says the company also uses its contacts with other investors to buy their stakes when they want out.

Hedgebay, a Nassau-based company, is trying to create a more organised secondary market in hedge funds by linking buyers and sellers via a website that has listed 15 buy and sell offers worth $67m in the past 10 days.

Many hedge funds do not allow secondary trading, as they want to control who their investors are, and they get a cancellation fee if customers leave during the long lock-up periods that follow an investment.

A final trick can overcome opposition even to secondary trading. Hedge funds held by a nominee bank can be bought and sold by the final investor without the fund being told – although some make an effort to retain control by sending monthly updates only to the named investor. As long as they get the hot hedge performance they wanted, many investors don’t care that they are investing blind.

Cigarettes and alcohol

Cigarettes and alcohol

Published: November 24 2006 13:00 | Last updated: November 24 2006 22:52

Emerging markets, the last bastion of growth for purveyors of cigarettes and alcohol, are cracking down on bad habits. Thailand plans to ban alcohol ads from next month, while Indonesia is mulling higher taxes on cigarettes.

This is a blow for profitability as well as vice. Cigarette manufacturers have assiduously sought to sell more in less health-conscious nations. Philip Morris last year paid $5.2bn for a cigarette manufacturer in Indonesia, a populous country where about 70 per cent of young men smoke. Similarly, brewers endeavour to cash in on countries where binge-drinking is on the rise: young Thais knock back an estimated 8.5 litres of alcohol each year. Others benefit too: tobacco is a big contributor to government revenues in Indonesia, while alcohol advertising helps fill the pockets of the media industry.

ADVERTISEMENT

Yet those who make money from the bad habits of others need not fret too much. Emerging markets typically exhibit fast economic growth and slow legislative processes. Industry lobbyists have clout, and could yet stymie the new proposals. Sin industries are generous sponsors and both Thailand and Indonesia, often in the news for the wrong reasons, need all the help they can get to woo tourist dollars. Thailand’s plans threaten to scotch next year’s Johnnie Walker Classic golf tournament in Phuket and the Bangkok Rock Festival. The government may well surmise there are less painful ways to beat the scourge of alcoholism.

Friday, November 24, 2006

Brain Teaser

发信人: yuwei (唯你温柔), 信区: JobHunting
标 题: 贡献一道题
发信站: The unknown SPACE (Wed Feb 24 12:03:19 1999), 站内信件

一个10L的圆柱型的筒,只有一个2L的刻度。
只用水,把所有的刻度找出来。

我只找到了5L,呜呜...


easy to do 2L, 4L, 6L, and 8L. But for 5L, I guess you probably first mark some place and then try to put two this amount volume of water into the jar to see whether it is finely fill up the jar.

Thursday, November 23, 2006

Brain teaser

You've got someone working for you for seven days and a gold bar to pay
them. The gold bar is segmented into seven connected pieces. You must give
them a piece of gold at the end of every day. If you are only allowed to make
two breaks in the gold bar, how do you pay your worker?


1-2-4

Some Good Headhunter

Steve Yendell



Selby Jennings, 145-157 St John Street, London, EC1V 4PY



T: 0207 348 6050


Ezratty, Elizabeth" or @huxley.com


不要去找那个huxley 的tina

Tuesday, November 21, 2006

http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:0qtX_0orJooJ:coachingcatalyst.blogspot.com/2006/07/how-to-handle-phone-interview.html+failure+handle+interview&hl=en&gl=uk&ct=clnk&cd=10&client=firefox-a

Interview Questions from WSJ

Interview Questions

Could you tell me a little about yourself?

Why did you leave your previous employer, or why are you leaving your present job?
What are your greatest strengths?
What are your weaknesses?
What type of salary do you have in mind?
What do you like most and least about your present job?
Are you applying for any other jobs?
Why should we hire you?
Where do you hope to be in five years?
Do you have any questions? Can you think of anything else you'd like to add?
What value can you add to my enterprise as an employee? How can you prove it?
Why do you want this job?
What do I need to know about you to get an accurate picture of what makes you tick?
What forces -- positive and negative -- do you think were most instrumental in shaping your style and your values?
Where do you see yourself in five years?
What are your life goals?
Where do you see yourself in 10 years?
You have two drums. One is three gallons and the other is five. You have an unlimited supply of water but need to get exactly four gallons. How could you do it?
Tell me about a complex problem you had to solve and walk me through your thinking as you solved it.
What did you do to prepare yourself for this interview?
Describe a specific experience working in a group or team situation where there was interpersonal conflict. Describe how you approached the conflict, what worked well, and what didn't. What was the outcome?
Describe a time when you had to change your communication style to deliver a message or get your point across.
Why are you interested in the [fill-in-the-blank] industry?
Which of your jobs was the least interesting? Why?
Which of your past jobs did you like the most?
What kind of an employee are you?
Describe your personality.
On your last performance evaluation, what did your supervisor criticize you for?
How do you normally handle criticism? Give an example.
Describe a situation when you felt you were unfairly criticized. What did you do?
What are your weaknesses? What have you done to correct those weaknesses?
How do you normally handle failure?
What did you like most about your last job? What do you like most about your present job?
What did you dislike the most about your last job? What do you dislike most about your current job?
What are you looking for in your next job?
Have you ever been fired or asked to resign? Why?
Why have you held so many jobs?
Why did you stay with one company for so long?
Do you consider yourself a loyal employee?
What are your career goals/objectives?
How does this job fit in with your career goals?
How do you feel about further training?
How do you normally handle change?
Would you like to have your boss's job?
Why haven't you progressed more in your career?
Do you consider yourself a success?
Have you ever been turned down for a raise?
Why aren't you earning more money at your age?
Do you consider yourself promotable?
What is the hardest thing you ever had to do in your job?
How would you describe your current boss's style?
How would your current boss describe your style?
How would you describe your relationship with your boss?
What have you learned from your boss?
When you are supervising people, how do you motivate them?
Describe a time when you resolved a conflict between two of your subordinates.
What would your subordinates say about you?
What do you look for in an employee?
How do you normally relate to office politics?
Describe a time when you got caught up in office politics unfairly.
Do you prefer to work alone or with others?
Do you consider yourself a team player?
Describe your style as a team player.
Do you consider yourself self-motivated? Describe a time when you took the initiative to accomplish something.
Name three personal characteristics that best describe you.
What motivates you?
Describe your relationship with your peers.
How do you handle conflict with peers?
What kind of people do you prefer to work with?
What kind of people do you dislike the most?
What were the people like at your last company? What are the people like at your present company?
What did you like the least about your last employer? What do you like least about your current employer?
What did you like the most about your last employer? What do you like the most about your current employer?
If you could change one thing about your last (or current) employer, what would it be?
Were you satisfied with your performance at your last company? Have you been satisfied with your performance at your current company?
Was your last boss satisfied with your performance? Is your current boss satisfied with your performance?
Tell me about a time when you failed personally.
How do you handle failures or weaknesses in others?
How would you describe your attitude toward risk?
Do you consider yourself a risk taker?
How do you normally handle crises?
Tell me about at time when you were under a great deal of pressure.
What kinds of decisions are most difficult for you?
Why has it taken you so long to find a new job?
Why does this job interest you?
How is this job different from the other positions you have interviewed for?
What kind of contribution do you think you could make to our organization?
What part of this job interests you the most?
What part of this job interests you the least?
How long do you plan to stay?
What makes you different from other candidates?
Where else are you interviewing?
When are you available to start?
Is there anything that I have forgotten to ask you?
Tell me about yourself.
Why did you leave your last job? Why do you want to leave your current job?
If you could do anything in your career differently what would it be?
What would your former (or current) boss say about you?
How do you handle authority?
What would your colleagues say about you?
Can we check your references?
How much money are you looking for?
How much are you presently earning?
Tell me about a time when you worked effectively under pressure.
Tell me about a time when you handled a difficult situation with a co-worker.
Tell me about a time when you were creative in solving a problem.
Tell me about a time when you missed an obvious solution to a problem.
Tell me about a time when you were unable to complete a project on time.
Tell me about a time when you persuaded team members to do things your way.
Tell me about a time when you wrote a report that was well-received.
Tell me about a time when you anticipated potential problems and developed preventive measures.
Tell me about a time when you had to make an important decision with limited facts.
Tell me about a time when you were forced to make an unpopular decision.
Tell me about a time when you had to adapt to a difficult situation.
Tell me about a time when you were tolerant of an opinion that was different from yours.
Tell me about a time when you were disappointed in your behavior.
Tell me about a time when you used your political savvy to push a program through that you really believed in.
Tell me about a time when you had to deal with an irate customer.
Tell me about a time when you delegated a project effectively.
Tell me about a time when you surmounted a major obstacle.
Tell me about a time when you set your sights too high (or too low).
Tell me about a time when you prioritized the elements of a complicated project.
Tell me about a time when you got bogged down in the details of a project.
Tell me about a time when you lost (or won) an important contract.
Tell me about a time when you made a bad decision.
Tell me about a time when you had to fire a friend.
Tell me about a time when you hired (or fired) the wrong person.
Tell me about a time when you turned down a good job.
What are people's greatest misperceptions about you?
If I were to call your manager, what would he or she say is the one thing that you're relied on for the most?
How would people describe you?
If you had to do it all over again, what would your career choice be and why?
If I were to talk with the people who know you best, how would they describe you?
Are you the right person for this job?
If I were to call your boss, and asked him or her about you, what would he or she say?
What motivates you at work?
What gets you up in the morning?
What did your father do?
Was your father successful?
Take me from college to the present in your career.
If your internal business clients were going to spend money on your training and development, what area might they spend it in?
标 题: 也说JPMorgan面发信站: 水木社区 (Fri Nov 17 16:03:29 2006), 站内上午在公司被偷袭,结果时间调到下午3点电话是从上海打来的,面我的听起来像是一个老外人很nice,很守时间问题如下:Which positions do you applying for?Why JPMorgan?If you have the opportunity to work in JPMorgan what is your big challenge? Have you prepared for it? when do you available to begin your work?Have you have any offer on hand or have you applied for other InvestmentBank?What is your predominance compared whith other appliers? 还有一些问题是针对简历来的,问了我的学习经历,为什么这样选择,实习经历,还有学校的活动是怎么组织的感觉不一样的职位问题不一样,我投了好几个,记不太清楚了,不过有一个可以肯定是RiskAnalyze 因为回答这个时得到了面试gg的肯定口语很好听懂,感觉有故意放慢语速不过就是我的口语大概很难让他听懂了,因为实在很烂,用词不准确,瞎说一气说一个星期内会给通知,以邮件或者电话的方式Final回在月底,至于哪个月底就没听清楚了,ms是Dec.因为我还在想总算面完了,不用再用蹩脚的英语解释什么了。万事大吉。呵呵,估计一定是被bs了,人生离完整又近了一步。感觉这一面倒像是随便打电话确认信息的,或者顺便考口语吧

发信人: tnote (发了), 信区: Career_Investment标 题: GIC面试折戟而归发信站: 水木社区 (Thu Nov 16 09:54:51 2006), 站内刚刚在北大面完GIC,面试官是一个中年人,约好9点,但我8:40刚去就被叫去面试,以下是他的面试问题:1,Self intro,2,Why fund management,3,Strength and weakness,4, Describe your personality,5, Failure,以下开始就全部是聊天了,其中包含了对简历的仔细询问,特别是实习经历,最后我问了几个问题感觉主要还是看你的个性,跟你的背景,成绩什么的,根本不care,面试过程持续40分钟,他的英语还是很标准的本来感觉不错,结果估计被笑拒,没有被邀请参加paper test,哭,插曲:遇到了传说中的piziliang,经鉴定果然是帅哥一枚

发信人: karya (伤花怒放), 信区: Career_Investment标 题: A friend's JPMorgan Interview experience发信站: 水木社区 (Thu Nov 16 02:42:08 2006), 站内I'm sorry that the computer in the lab does not have the Chinese input, so I can only tpye English here. Hope her experience will give u some help here. She's interviewing with Markets, London office.3 30 mins face to face interview sections, a numerical testThe interview questions includeWhy IB?Why JPMorgan?Why the position?Some specific questions about resume, past experience and failureA scenario question about teamworkSome math question and she said they were quite simpleWish u guys good luck and wish her good luck

发信人: piziliang (把你宠坏), 信区: Career_Investment标 题: 也发JPMORGAN面经发信站: 水木社区 (Wed Nov 15 22:28:26 2006), 站内1,Self-introduction,2,the difference between JPMorgan and other investment banks,3, the difference between local securities and foreign banks,4, about ACCA, CGA, 线路效果巨差,对方按了免提,两个人面我,一男一女,导致我这边感觉单词是一个一个跳跃性的蹦过来的,道歉了两次,几乎每个问题我都重复了一遍,或者让对方重复一遍。整个过程10分钟左右,郁闷。

发信人: feyer (Buy low sell high), 信区: Career_Investment标 题: 发面经发信站: 水木社区 (Wed Nov 15 20:59:08 2006), 站内早上9:30,高华,面得想去死。估计我申的是trader, 全是技术问题。问2年+10年的一个债券组合,与5年的债券假如duration一样,利率变的话两个组合价值有什么区别,现在还不明白面试官想问什么。。。估计是啥没学过的然后立即换了一个问题,看一个中间下凹的yield curve,问可以有什么交易策略,傻在那儿了,555随后2分钟看了一张股票收盘表格,收走,问记得什么,哭死。最后面试官无奈了,问我floating rate bond怎么定价,我怎么就在TIPS上死缠烂搅了,出了房间意识到TIPS是根据通胀率调整利率的。于是,心爱的高华,从身边溜走。10:15,调整心态,马上就得面高盛。第一个见了传说中的Amenda Wu,很nice的北大毕业的JJ。是在东京做credit trading的,正好是我感兴趣的方向。问了简历,还有我自己实习时候做的一些小儿科交易。到说byebye的时候,暗自庆幸没有数学题。第二个见了一个美国人,女的,非常非常nice,谈佩尔森访华,谈自己做的社会工作,还被指出简历有一处用词不当,那个汗。突然问我Gamma是什么,我说不会用英文表达,写公式吧,然后她说呵呵,算了,有人专门拷问你的数学~~最后还送我出了面试房间,顺便问了下hr拷问我数学的人是谁@@然后噩梦降临。我和那个strategist无意提到了Greek,于是啥是delta,啥是gamma,啥是theta,价格上升,delta怎么变, gamma怎么变;delta升高,gamma怎么变。然后我暗暗后悔,忙说这些greek我都是自学的,没想过那么深。。。strategist失望状,说你学过那些数学课啊,小心翼翼的说微积分,线性代数,概率,随机。然后马上追问线性代数用的多么,orz,忙说不多不多,于是再次失望。于是再次问我你们经常用什么啊,我忙说我会随机。结果没被理睬。。。最后strategist无奈,说我们做道概率题吧,我严阵以待。题目就不披露了,很好的题目,dynamic selection,我一开始思路错了,被面试官驳倒,启发,重新做,结果虽然做出来了,还是超时了。昏昏沉沉出了紫光会议中心,赶往BAIN。第一个面试官是新加坡人,case是关于一个法国电器商要进入中国市场而且考虑是不是要往中端市场发展。第二个是个韩国人,做了两个case,一个是tele-marketer要出售信用卡考虑招人的问题,一个是日本的canned coffee进入中国市场的问题。觉得挺对不起BAIN的,那两个面试官太好了,或者说BAIN给我的感觉太好了,自己根本没准备就过去了,脑子基本也不转了,简直就是在浪费面试官的时间。说今晚就会通知结果,等拒电中。。。

发信人: tnote (发了), 信区: Career_Investment标 题: JPMorgan IBD面经发信站: 水木社区 (Wed Nov 15 20:47:12 2006), 站内本来约好昨天晚上的,结果刚刚面完,面试官是一个1st yr analyst base in BJ,以下是她的问题:1, Why IB?2, Why JP? JP's deals in China?3, Summer experience in another IB?4, Compare DCF and Comps?5, WACC in DCF?6, How to choose comparable companies?7, Difference in financial advisor to buy side and sell side?8, What's strength you can bring to JP as opposed to other candidates?9, Any CFA or CPA?面试官在第一个问题上纠缠了很长时间,为什么转专业,为什么不想再原来的行业之类的全程持续了20分钟左右她说下周会通知结果,下一轮就是final

发信人: netwind (往事如风), 信区: Career_Investment标 题: 去年高盛电面的一个常见问题发信站: 水木社区 (Sat Oct 28 11:56:15 2006), 站内看到n个人被问到,4。whether applied for other firmsinterviewer这样问的用意何在

发信人: irmaxwell (Maxwell), 信区: Career_Investment标 题: Goldman Sachs Japan Markets (Equity/FICC) Phone Interview发信站: 水木社区 (Tue Oct 31 17:58:25 2006), 站内Start: 16:53;End: 17:08;Questions:1. Why are you interested in a full-time role in markets?2. How do you see the financial industry?3. How do you think Goldman to help China develop?4. How do you think a career in the Japan office?5. Any questions?Next Communication: in a week.

发信人: piziliang (把你宠坏), 信区: Career_Investment标 题: 面完Goldman,郁闷无比发信站: 水木社区 (Tue Oct 31 21:49:07 2006), 站内被问到两个问题:1,Why Equity/FICC in Goldman Sachs?2, Tell me something about yourself except work experience and academic?然后我问两:一是下次面试结果时间通知。二是国美收购永乐的最大影响,结果对方听不懂,复述一遍,又听不懂。于是赶紧转到另一个问题,中国Mergers & Acqusitions 的未来发展情况。感觉非常郁闷,面试时间延长到18分钟42秒,耽误对方很多时间。。。

发信人: xy2 (xy), 信区: Career_Investment标 题: 高华电面面经发信站: 水木社区 (Thu Nov 2 13:35:49 2006), 站内昨天下午3点打得。 Vicky from S&T.1. the specific position you want to do, why我说了equity research,然后blabla, 后来才知道是S&T部门面试,哭。。。2. tell me the achievement you are proud of most3.给会计知识打分4.Which role did you play in the teamwork5.随便说了一个简历中提到的做过的项目没注意看时间,应该是二十分钟不到没有让问问题。

发信人: xiangshan7 (我有一个面具), 信区: Career_Investment标 题: 电面完GS,sales and trading ....发信站: 水木社区 (Wed Nov 1 17:15:33 2006), 站内question1.why sales?2.sales or trading?3.tokyo,beijing or hongkong?4.example of teamwork5.example of challenge job6.example of difficulty in teamwork and solving method7.any other information of yourself want to tell me?----------------------------这个回答的最崩溃。。。。。不知道她是否听懂。。。虽然她一直说OK。。。。。然后没让我问她问题。。。。。就说邮件通知结果,两周内。。。。希望对还没有面的同学能有帮助。。。。bless。。。。。。。。。

发信人: wmrabbit (rabbit), 信区: Career_Investment标 题: 偶也刚面完GS-------5555555555我的口语呀发信站: 水木社区 (Wed Nov 1 17:30:16 2006), 站内问题都差不多why Goldman?why sales and trading?How do you think the financial industry?teamwork exampleachievementDo you have international experienece?Do you prefer Beijing?最搞笑的是因为我的英语实在太烂了最后她竟然让我给自己的英语打分@_@从1到10分555555我只好说for spoken english, may be 6,7for written and listening english, may be 8,9呵呵

发信人: babybear (pumbaa), 信区: Career_Investment标 题: 发Goldman Sachs面经攒其他方面rp发信站: 水木社区 (Thu Nov 2 18:10:19 2006), 站内感觉自己回答的......哎不过高盛的那个GG很和善:)免去自我介绍1. Why Goldman Sachs?Sale & Trading?2. 这个问题最ft,看我专业是工科,问我对finance了解多少。我就只好说不咋了解,实话。finance专业词汇极度欠缺,如果硬说的话估计句子都串不下去了...3. Teamwork Experience? Your role. Teamwork的key point是啥4. 问我准备presentation或其他重要事务不充分,或者出现一些unexpected的情况,我怎么办处理?(挺绕的,我没听清楚就pardon了一下...后来用中文给我解释了问题,不过中文也听绕的)啊...我基本没有类似情况啊...后来只好说了一个我认为还勉强凑合的例子...5. What is your proudest achievement?6. 问我还投了那些IBD?最后让我问问题...我问了一个比较弱的问题高盛GG很耐心帮我解释了很多高盛里面的东东,teamwork啊,training啊,以及压力大啊等等

发信人: tnote (发了), 信区: Career_Investment标 题: 巴克莱面试发信站: 水木社区 (Fri Nov 3 10:40:58 2006), 站内10:20刚刚面完,两个面试官,分别来自trading和research分别问问题,问的问题很简单:Why Investment bank?Why Barclays Capital?Why Investment Banking and Debt Capital Markets?Any teamwork experience?Any team leader experience?MM theory?Any non academic hobby?Any failure?然后就是我问问题hr说两周内会通知下一轮。bless all

发信人: xy2 (xy), 信区: Career_Investment标 题: Barclays Capital面经发信站: 水木社区 (Sat Nov 4 12:52:25 2006), 站内面完后一直被实验室项目虐,到现在才有空发面经。我面的research dep.,面试官是Haizhou Huang 和Yue Wu。大约20分钟。全英文。1.Why Barclays?2.Which position did you apply? Why?3.What is the biggest challenge for China's security market to develop?4.Tell me about one of the project you have done,the process and the result5.What do you think about global imbalance?6.What role did you play in the teamwork?7.Have you ever worked with sales or traders?8.Do you know how much Value have been created from any of your work?问了他们三个问题?1。Why foreign investment bank seldom recruit research people from China?2. What responsibility will the position take?3. Why type of clients do they hace in China?

发信人: karya (伤花怒放), 信区: Career_Investment标 题: 补barclays capital的面经发信站: 水木社区 (Thu Nov 9 17:28:08 2006), 站内弄完之后有几个assignment的deadline,今天补上SalesWhy IB?Why Barcalys?Why Sales?Summer jobAny other companiy also interview with?基本上就这些了16分钟

C++ Programming Insights

1. Difference between Static and Const

Basically, static is a prefix for the storage. When you declare it before a variable, function, a class, you actually mean it is stored at the beginning of a program and will destroy at the end of the program. A static member data can only be called by a static member function in a class (??)

So it will natural that a static member of a class does not need an specific object existing, you can access it by :: without referring to any real objects.

However, const is a concept about the changing. A const variable can't be changed during funcation call, a const object must be initialized at the begining, and a const data can't be modified during the program.

2. const function declaration:

const int get(); a function will return a const int
int get() const; a class member funtion that is a const, will not change any values.
int get(const); a function whose member arguments are const, which will not be changed during this function call.

3. Copy constructor.

A copy constructor must use a reference to another object to avoid executing the default constructor infinite time.

Monday, November 20, 2006

金融业就业情况综述(ZT)

============================================================================
标 题: 金融业就业情况综述(ZT)
发信站: 水木社区 (Sun Nov 19 13:06:37 2006), 站内

=======从近几年就业情况来看,金融学专业毕业通常有这样几种去向:
一、商业银行 包括四大行和股份制商行、外资银行驻国内分支机构。。

二、证券公司 含基金管理公司

三、信托投资公司、投资咨询公司

四、四大资产管理公司、金融租赁、担保公司

五、保险公司六、中央(人行)银行、银行业监督管理委员会、证券业监督管理委员会、保险业监督管理委员会。。这是金融监管管理机构。

七、国家开发银行、中国农业发展银行等政策性银行八、社保基金管理中心(或社保局,通常为保险方向)

九、国家公务员序列。。政府行政机构 如财政、审计、海关部门等;高等院校金融财政专业教师;研究机构研究人员。

十、上市(或欲上市)股份公司证券部、财务部、证券事务代表、董事会秘书处等

===============分析:
一、一九九八以来,银行及证券、保险行业管理机构加大了对金融专业毕业生的需求,进入行业管理部门做金融公务员,对于金融毕业生而言应是首选.
--A 其一中国金融学是立足于宏观经济学,基于金融市场宏观调控,专业应用较易入手,

--B 其二是在行业管理部门做上三五年再入行到实践机构至少能给个中层以上的职位。

--C 局限是:要进入这几个行业主管部门难度较大,可能还需要背景依托,本科生想进较难,研究生也要有一定的关系。

二、进入国有四大商业银行是很好的选择。
--A 具备一定的银行业从业经验,专业背景,到股份制商行或外资行的可能性会增大。

三、政策性银行如开发行、农发行亦是较佳选择
--A 但其工作性质类似公务员,金融业务并不突出,是靠政策吃饭的地方,

--B 若想在金融领域成一时气候最好不要,但目前工资水平待遇等都较商业银行为好。。

四、证券、信托、基金这三家均是靠风险管理吃饭,存在行业系统风险因素.
--A 一旺俱旺,赚钱相对较易,短期回报较高(风险亦大),且按真正的企业管理机制运行,

--B 如果想在专业方面有所发展,有所建树,在这一行业做是极佳选择,很多基金经理、投资银行经理人员都年薪过百M。

--C 难点是学历要求在逐步提高,相对于银行等金融机构其个人投资管理、金融运营能力要求更高。

五、保险公司可以参照对商业银行的分析、社保以及财政审计部门等等是养老的地方,稳定有余,灵动不足。

六、四大资产管理公司类似于政策性银行,金融租赁担保这个行业发展迅速,可以考虑进入。

七、上市公司证券部工作亦可,先天上横跨证券产业两行,再要发展有立脚点。

八、高校、研究所是有志于做学术的同学的首选。

九. 金融管理与国际金融就在下以为,
--A 其培养目标可能仍定为于原来的商行经营或是金融企业经营管理,

--B 并比较侧重于国际业务方面。

--C 我国当前最缺的是金融机构的专业管理人才,以及精通国际业务的银行专业人才,

--D 而且如果对于英语有特定的要求的话,那么在外资金融机构从业也是很好的选择。

--E 金融市场与金融工程现在是比较热的,原因在于国内金融行业已经察觉到以往的金融人才培养所欠缺的金融工具数量整合,模态建设,数理分析人才的培养,在证券 公司、信托公司以及保险公司甚至一些国内大型商业银行总部已经注意吸纳这部分人才,这应该是个较佳选择。

十. 如果您的目标是进入四大总行的话,
--A 那么您在读研阶段应该注意在国内著名金融专业刊物上发表一定量有见地的文论,这就是通常所说的做学问的能力或是研究能力,

--B 同时,不妨与所在地商行分行进行联系,可以兼职从业。

--C最好是进一步读博,而且要考国内名师的博士

--D每年二三月人民银行系统有一次系统内招录考试,以天津分行辖区内的华北地区为例是到保定考试,支行、中心支行、分行三级招录都是要经过这个考试。

--E以证监会太原特派办为例,我们毕业时有一个同学被录取了,同时还参加了公务员资格考试,如是而已。待遇是比较不错的,升迁机会也多,应该是本科或是研究生的不错选择。

十一. 人总行或是总会的情况不是很了解,偶比较熟悉的是省级这一块。。
1、政策性银行薪水通常和人行相仿佛,但其各种名目的福利、奖金、补助颇多,偶一个朋友在农发展省行,刚上班半月莫名其妙发了一个季度奖,平时发这发那更是常事


2、证券、基金、信托三者中,
--A 前两个是以证券资产的经营为主,后者则是具备横跨资本证券、产业、货币三个市场的具有很大业务空间的行业,

--B通常所说的投资银行是指证券公司、信托投资公司。

3、去证券和基金也要看想要从事什么样的工作,
--A 在基金公司应届毕业生大体上能做到基金助理就很不错了,

--B 主要是招收金融、法律、经济学类的研究生;

--C 而在证券因为分成几大利润空间,如果做经纪业务,学营销或是金融管理还是不错,

--D 如果想做投行学法律或是证券投资、公司财务、金融工程都是很多对口的。

4、现在我国的资产管理公司主要是以处置国有大中型企业及原四大商行的不良资产为主业,距离金融创新还是有差距的,学法律、金融财务或是投资均可。

5、到投行学证券投资、金融工程、公司财务、法律以及产业经济学是比较适用。
--A 大一点的投行通常喜欢在国内著名的大学招人,偶所知的北大、人大、清华、复旦、上财都是不错的选择,

--B 但也有例外,如果个人能力比较突出,普通一点的理工科院校进入的也较多,偶认识一个申万的同行是北方交大产业经济学毕业,是理工科背景。

6、学金融市场学或金融工程是比较对口的,不过各校情况不一,
--A 南开在这方面较强,不过要求数学底子要好。

--B 学这个专业现在各大行、券商、信托公司都是比较重视的,

--C 外资行尤其如此,主要是搞金融产品的研发设计、投资工具模态分析,是比较前沿和靠近国外金融量化经营思路。

7、人大的金融在国内可称一二。
--当然这与人大的校友资源不无关系,试看人大在财政部门、国有银行及各类金融机构中的著名校友就可以知道,

--毕业通常是要去各大行的总行或是人民银行、“三会”以及现在扩张力度比较大的几家股分制商业银行(薪水可观)、证券公司总部。

--上财在上海是极强的,这和上海的金融中心地位有关,上海交大的情况不是很了解。。

--“人大硕士毕业年薪十万”,这和所在行业有关不能一概而论。如果是国内大行这个目标可能是很难达到,年薪达到六、七万就颇可观了,在证券公司有这个可能,但要视证券市场行情涨跌而定,还有就是所处岗位。

====================发展趋势:
一. 在四大金融支柱行业中,银行从可预见的未来来看,仍是保持强势地位的,他有着长期积累的资本与机构网络优势。

二. 同时我国的银行业在经过一段时间的整合之后,结构会更加优化,竞争会更加激烈,管理会更加趋向科学合理,现代管理思维管理方式管理机制的引进是逐步的,具有一定的银行从业经历,对于您下一步去外资或是其他金融机构是有益无害的。

三. 偶还是看好在银行业的发展,毕竟证券行业仍是一个弱势(资本市场的不健全不成熟、证券经营体制的不合理、投资银行业发展对经济环境的高度依赖性、不确定因 素对整个行业可能带来的冲击等等)行业,他的资金他的网络他的产品与服务,他的业务利润增长在分业经营条件下是无法超越银行业的。

四. 同进,如果有一天我国打破分业界限,证券公司向商业银行的转型或扩张或是采取金融控股公司的形式实现实质的混业。也不是不可预期,这样,届时银行管理人才必然成为市场抢手。

五. 在专业方向的选择上,金融管理可能会比较适合在银行从业证券公司亦可,而金融工程人才也是商业银行下一步发展所急需的,同时在整个金融业中具有一定的优势地位。

六. 西南财大据偶所知,是很强的,金融学科是重点学科而且是最早具有该学科博士授予权的单位,业内也是很认同的,近年来是因为其地缘优势不突出。

七. 清华金融以微观数量研究为主,同西方国家金融研究方法特别是美国的金融数学研究、金融工程有一定的渊源,是个很好的选择,就业方面以清华之名气,和经济管理学院十余年之影响挟金融学之强势,应该是很好的说.

八. 如果想走公务员序列呢,以偶所认识的人大老师及他们所提及的学生就业来看,
--A 考法律或是财政税务方面的研究生应该是对路的,

--B 考金融的如果去了公职部门(金融行业监督管理部门除外),是很浪费人才的.

九. 另外,人大经济学院黄卫平院长的国际经济学应该是个不坏的选择,
--A 黄老师是国务院智囊团成员,涉及入世的谈判代表团成员,

--B 如果想做国家外交或是外贸方面的干部,考黄老师的研究生应该很好。

--C不过黄近来主要是带博士,硕士每年只有一二个,当然报考的人也不是很多。

十. 任何所谓热门专业如果过滥,都会有泡沫危险,现在金融学专业总体上比例还是合理的,当然我是指本研究生这一块,如果算上本科的大批毕业生,那么在未来三五年内高端职位这一块就有点拥挤了。

十 一.当然,目前本科生在金融行业中主要是具体的业务操作高层次的管理、研发、运营还要求有一定的高学历和专业背景,可以大胆点说,以当前金融专业硕士生扩 招的速度,以及大量所谓海归金融人才的渗入,以后中国金融行业的高端人才肯定会过剩,当然,那是在以当前金融经济总量来衡量的,未来怎么样,还取决于中国 金融业的整体 发展。

十二. 您毕业有年,年齿上可能已不占优势,但工作经历本身就是一种资本,在很多时候,你做过什么可能要比你学过什么重要的多!而研究生教育本身是一种本科后教育,三十岁左右尚不算老,亦不晚。。呵呵。。如果有心尝试,那现在就努力吧!

十三. 如果是学法律出身,那么就要在行业分析、资产运营方面有所了解,一些财务、证券知识应该是必备的,建议以财政部CPA考试教材为蓝本, 亦可听听会计专业的课程。

十四. 投行包括很多种业务,资产证券化只是其中之一部分,并不是任何岗位都需要数学参与,您如果有心,司考是应该过的,注会的财务管理这一块是要好好学学。

十五. 上海财大的期货全国有名的,其实期货证券两都很多地方是不可分的,学证券亦可。

十 六. 另外,未来十年内,中国期货业的发展真是不好衡量但如果在一些衍生产品、金融投资工具开发上有一些新举措,那么应该是前途光明的!一个农业大国,如果在期 货流转方面不尽如人意,那么相应资金运作就会有些问题,所以还是要有信心的!华东师大国际金融很强,由此而言世界经济学应该是国内一流。

鼎晖创投从“傍大行”到“大行”

鼎晖创投从“傍大行”到“大行”

来源 新财富 发布时间 2006年08月15日 11:19
作者 李凌 关键词 新财富;鼎晖创投;私募股权基金;

  外界鲜有人了解,鼎晖创业投资管理有限公司—这家极其低调的本土私募股权投资基金,是南孚电池被卖给外资竞争对手吉列一事的始作俑者,也是乳业巨头蒙牛的“伯乐”。
   作为中国第一家以有限合伙制运营的私募股权基金,2005年以前,由于资本市场不够完善等诸多原因,鼎晖只能走一条“傍大行”的发展之路:凭借本土管理 团队的人脉资源和专业能力寻找、发现目标企业,然后联合摩根士丹利、高盛等国际投行共同投资,并借助这些大投行广泛的国际投资者资源和丰富的操作经验,共 同打造一条“海外IPO生产线”。此举在一定程度上保证了其所投项目在海外上市的成功率。
  如今,中国股权市场发生着翻天覆地的变化,新增“有 限合伙”规定的《合伙企业法》修订草案也将获得通过,私募股权投资基金的资金来源和退出渠道都在向国内转移。随着以公众股权(上市公司)为顶、以私募股权 基金为第二层、以创业风险基金为第三层、以天使投资为底层的金字塔式股权市场加速形成,也许我们可以看到,外资机构在中国股权投资市场的作用会大打折扣, 像鼎晖这样的本土投资机构,反而会成为外资大行们依傍的对象。
  李凌/文
  联手国际大投行打造“海外IPO生产线”,成功退出率达60%,获利超过15亿元
  成功退出蒙牛乳业等6个项目,收益率超过130%
   相关资料显示,鼎晖创业投资管理有限公司(以下简称鼎晖)自2002年成立后的开山之作是投资蒙牛乳业(02319.HK),而这一投资故事却是业界耳 熟能详的摩根士丹利经典案例,“发现”蒙牛乳业的鼎晖只是这个故事的配角。从成立至2005年底的3年多时间,鼎晖共投资了约9个项目,其中,蒙牛乳业、 李宁体育(02331.HK)、速达软件、分众传媒、雨润食品(江苏雨润食品,01068.HK)、永乐家电(00503.HK)分别在香港和纳斯达克上 市,其成功退出率超过60%。
  在蒙牛乳业和永乐家电的投资中,鼎晖共获利4.12亿港元以上。据香港联交所的公告资料,2004年12月20 日及2005年6月14日,鼎晖两次分别以6.06港元、4.95港元的价格向其他投资人配售了35624785股、41072445股蒙牛乳业股份,共 套现4.19亿港元,第二次配售完成后,鼎晖还持有273776股蒙牛乳业股份(不包括剩余部分及其他可转换股份)。根据蒙牛乳业上市时摩根士丹利、鼎 晖、英联所签的禁售承诺,这部分股权要在蒙牛乳业上市满一年半之后才可以出售,也就是2005年12月28日后才可转让。而蒙牛乳业的股价这之后一直保持 在6.5港元以上,因此,鼎晖售出这部分股份也至少可再套现178万港元。
  据推算,鼎晖在蒙牛乳业上的总投入约为1685万美元。资料显示, 2002年11月28日,摩根士丹利、鼎晖投资、英联投资公司同时投资蒙牛,首轮投资2597万美元全部到位。2004年5月,三方又追加投资3523万 美元。据《招股说明书》,蒙牛乳业在上市前共有六大股东,分别是银牛公司(44.8%)、 金牛公司(21.1%)、牛根生(6.1%)、摩根士丹利(MSDairy,18.7%)、鼎晖投资(CDH,5.9%)和英联(CIC,3.4%)。按 照股权比例推算,鼎晖的投资额约为1290万美元。再加上这三家金融机构持有本金总额为18676035美元的可换股股份权利,蒙牛乳业上市后鼎晖行使这 部分换股权的代价约为395万美元。以此计算,鼎晖的这一投资获利约2.9亿港元,投资回报率达到219%。
  在对永乐家电的投资中,鼎晖联手 摩根士丹利更是以短平快的方式获得了高额回报。2005年1月,鼎晖和摩根士丹利以每股0.92港元、共5000万美元的总价收购了永乐家电20%的股 权。其中,鼎晖以约5440万港元认购了约5914万股永乐家电股份。在上市前的2005年10月9日,摩根士丹利和鼎晖还行使了财务投资者购股权,分别 购入8549.91万股、1385.56万股,总行使价约为1765万美元,相当于每股1.38港元。因此,鼎晖在永乐家电的投资共约7352万港元。上 市半年后的2006年4月24日,鼎晖以每股3.225港元的价格向其他投资人配售了所持股份的一半,约套现1.177亿港元。这次配售完成后,鼎晖仍持 有永乐家电36497642股股份,按照协议,这部分股权要在第一次配售的90天后才可转让。按2006年7月11日收市价2.125港元计算,其市值约 为7750万港元,随着国美收购永乐,这部分股权的市值会产生相应变化。以此计算,鼎晖在15个月的时间里获利约1.22亿港元,投资回报率达到 165%。
  在其他三个退出的项目中,鼎晖也收获颇丰。鼎晖是分众传媒第二轮融资的领投人,据分众传媒招股说明书,鼎晖的投资金额为600万美 元。分众传媒上市时,鼎晖套现1.59%的股份,获得约859万美元。据其内部人士介绍,鼎晖目前继续持有其余1994.52万股股份,相当于 199.452万份存托凭证,按分众传媒目前每份存托凭证约63美元的价格计算,鼎晖这部分股份市值约为1.257亿美元。这是鼎晖小投资大回报的经典案 例,投资回报率超过21倍。
  2005年3月,高盛、鼎晖和新加坡政府投资基金(GIC)联合向雨润食品投资了约7000万美元,其中高盛向雨 润食品投资了3000万美元,鼎晖投资了2200万美元,GIC投资了1800万美元。雨润食品公告资料显示,鼎晖持有雨润食品上市后总股本的3.5%, 共51128370股股份。按2006年7月13日的收市价5.85港元计算,其持股市值约3亿港元,与其投资额相比约有74%的溢价。
  上市 前,雨润食品与三家战略投资者签署了“对赌协议”,如果雨润食品2005年盈利未能达到2.592亿元,战略投资者有权要求大股东以溢价20%的价格赎回 所持股份。而年报资料显示,雨润食品2005年利润总额远超这一数额,达3.59亿元,因此根据“对赌协议”,鼎晖、摩根士丹利、GIC在上市满1年后才 可套现退出。而雨润食品的业绩稳定增长,2005年每股盈利为0.344元,较上年的0.185元增长了约86%。2006年6月又以6741万元收购大 股东祝义才及其配偶吴学琴持有的安徽福润100%股权。安徽福润为农业产业化国家重点龙头企业,可获豁免所得税。据花旗估计,若雨润食品整体有效税率由 15%降至10%,2007及2008年度其盈利可分别达到5.16亿元及5.85亿元。可以预计,鼎晖等三家战略投资人在2006年10月可退出时的获 利应比目前看高一线。
  仅从这四个项目中,鼎晖盈利至少达到15亿元以上。即使不算其他投资项目的收益,鼎晖基金投资的总收益率也已超过130%(表1)。


  起底
  鼎晖取得辉煌业绩,与“傍上”两大国际投行摩根士丹利、高盛不无关系。从已上市的案例看,蒙牛乳业、永乐家电两家公司 是与摩根士丹利联合投资的,雨润食品、分众传媒是与高盛(以及其他投资人)联合投资的。在目前还未上市的项目中,鼎晖与高盛联合投资了双汇集团,与摩根士 丹利联合投资了山东山水集团(图1)。


  能够与两大国际投行形成长期而稳定的合作伙伴关系,源于鼎晖前身—中国国际金融有限公司(以下简称中金公司)直接投资部。中金公司是由 中国建设银行、摩根士丹利及几家国内外企业联合组建的投资银行,2002年以前,中金公司直接投资部存续期间,投资了多个项目,包括中国移动、新浪网等, 而且,中金公司分别与高盛、摩根士丹利担任了这两家公司上市的主承销商。另外,中金直接投资部与摩根士丹利、高盛联合投资了南孚电池、长天控股等项目。
   2001年,中国证监会发布了不允许证券公司从事风险投资业务的规定,中金公司将其直接投资部及投资业务进行分拆,投资业务分拆成两家公司。其中,已投 资产的外资部分由三家外商投资机构接手并成立了一家创投机构;内资部分则由7家合伙人在开曼群岛注册成立有限责任合伙公司CDH China Fund L.P(以下简称CDH)共同接手(表2)。分拆以后的两家创投机构在业务上彼此独立,中金公司也从鼎晖的发起人中彻底退出。


  根据香港联交所公告资料,CDH于2002年5月22日在开曼群岛成立,7名有限责任合伙人包括苏黎士投资集团(Capital Z Investment II,L.P.)、国际金融公司、East Light(新加坡政府投资公司GIC的全资子公司)、韩国三星人寿保险公司(Samsung Life)及荷兰DNIB投资基金(专为医护人员设立的强制性退休基金)等。Capital Z Investment II,L.P.是由9名美国或加拿大的投资专家、财务总监、法律总监持有的有限合伙基金,持有CDH约27.8%的股权,国际金融公司、East Light、DNIB的实益股东分别持有CDH约22.5%的股权,Samsung Life约持有3.4%。CDH自2002年8月8日开始进行一连串集资,截至2002年底筹集了8900万美元。
  CDH的普通合伙人为 CDH China Holdings Company Limited,是在开曼群岛注册成立的有限责任公司,其担当基金经理人的角色。CDH China Holdings Company Limited成立了董事会和投资委员会,各由三名成员组成,分别由苏黎士投资集团、East Light及CDH高级管理层提名。前者负责管理CDH的营运、监管CDH人力资源及审批年度预算等,后者负责监察尽职审查、批核所有投资决策及退出投资 计划。CDH的任何投资计划均需要投资委员会成员一致同意方可执行。
  而在之前约一个月,2002年4月15日,中金公司直接投资部董事总经理吴尚志、副总经理焦树阁、高级经理王霖等五名干将与中国经济技术投资担保有限公司共同出资成立了深圳市鼎晖创业投资管理有限公司,作为普通合伙人主要负责CDH的管理运作(图2)。


  事实上,鼎晖是中国第一家采用有限合伙形式设立的创业投资机构(2001年7月,新疆天业(600075)和新疆石河子开发区总公司作 为有限合伙人出资99%、北京新华信管理咨询公司作为普通合伙人出资1%共同投资5000万元的全国第一家有限合伙企业“天绿投资”,因事涉上市公司,几 乎在鼎晖成立的同时被证监会叫停。另外,在江苏高新区试点成立的一家合伙制投资机构无疾而终),其成立的依据是中关村颁发的《有限合伙管理办法》,合伙双 方可通过协议的方式对彼此的责任进行明确。
  鼎晖国内基金合伙协议的起草者、大成律师事务所高级合伙人魏君贤律师不愿透露鼎晖的具体操作情况, 但据魏介绍,由于目前中国有限合伙企业相关立法的缺如,目前在内地活跃的投资基金基本上都是通过在美国、开曼、英属维京群岛或香港等国家、地区设立有限合 伙企业离岸运行,其合伙企业的基本框架为:由基金管理人担任普通合伙人,发起设立有限合伙企业,其出资一般为总资金的1%,而基金的有限合伙人承诺并认缴 基金出资的绝大部分(总资金的99%)。普通合伙人全权负责基金的投资、经营和管理,作为回报,普通合伙人一般每年提取相当于基金总额约2%的管理费,以 及占基金超额收益一定比例(一般为20%左右)的收益分配。有限合伙人不参与有限合伙企业的经营管理。
  如果按照这样的分配方式,鼎晖的有限合伙人至少获利12亿元,管理团队的收益也在3亿元以上。
  “海外IPO生产线”
   对一家诞生于本土的合伙制私募股权基金,其盈利最终必须通过退出来实现。鼎晖利用与摩根士丹利、高盛等国际机构的紧密合作关系,共同打造了一个“海外 IPO生产线”:鼎晖发现项目—联合摩根士丹利、高盛等共同投资—借助国际投行的经验及其广泛的全球化投资者资源—最终实现海外上市,大大提高了投资项目 的退出率。
  除了中金公司的渊源,鼎晖能够与摩根士丹利、高盛形成伙伴关系的另一个重要原因,是鼎晖团队发现项目的能力。据透露,蒙牛乳业就是 鼎晖从中金公司独立出来前就看好的项目。据知情人士透露,2001年初,现任鼎晖创投总经理的焦震(即焦树阁)开始关注蒙牛乳业,其时蒙牛正处在一个快速 上升阶段,很需要发展资金。而很多机构也都看好蒙牛的前景,主动找牛根生谈投资。焦震与牛根生接触后,双方谈得很好,牛后来在对其他人提起焦震时,用了 “一见如故”四个字。而且,焦震还可以带动摩根士丹利加入投资团队。据了解,当时摩根士丹利的态度是,焦震他们进入,摩根士丹利就进入。但由于那时鼎晖刚 好要从中金公司分拆出来,相关手续没有办完,所以直到鼎晖成立之后的2002年,三家投资者(包括英联)才完成对蒙牛的投资。当然,在这期间,三家机构联 合对蒙牛乳业做了不下十次的调研,到真正投资时对这个项目都已经相当认同了。
  而“发现”南孚电池项目的过程也从一个层面体现了鼎晖团队的“眼 光”。1997年下半年,在中金公司直接投资部任职的焦震去了解朋友介绍的一家天津电池企业。当时,焦对碱性电池行业了解并不多,他就向朋友咨询电池行业 的发展情况,由此知道了南孚、双鹿、白象等几个比较活跃的企业。在后来对电池行业的考察中,焦不断听到业内人士提起南孚的名字。有一次,焦偶然听到一帮大 学生聊天时提到南孚电池特别好用,这使得他一下子对南孚产生了特殊兴趣。
  焦震通过各种人脉关系与南孚公司进行接触,并作了大量的准备,双方见 面时,焦震非常了解对方的需求,和南孚老总聊了一晚上,说服了对方考虑接受投资。之后又是一年多的时间,经过对市场规模、销售方案、竞争对手等多个方面的 研究,中金公司最终与南孚方面达成共识。这期间,焦震还陪同南孚老总多次赴美考察电池企业。当最终达成投资协议,中金公司直接投资部、摩根士丹利、新加坡 政府投资公司等联合投资南孚电池的时候,已经是1999年下半年了。据了解,这期间焦震跑福建就不下60趟,而为了南孚项目做的大量调研,使得焦震成了一 个电池行业专家。
  尽管2003年8月鼎晖、摩根士丹利等将持有的南孚电池股权转给其最大的竞争对手吉列,受到相当多国人的质疑,但摩根士丹利 从这单投资中获利超过100%,无疑使其对鼎晖团队发现和把握项目的能力有了很直观的了解和认识。这也是其后鼎晖从中金公司独立出来后,仍然能够与摩根士 丹利、高盛成为紧密合作伙伴的重要原因。
  联合摩根士丹利、高盛,不仅使鼎晖的投资更容易被目标企业接受,这些国际大投行拥有的丰富经验、对海 外资本市场的谙熟以及广泛的国际投资者资源,也可以加大企业海外上市的成功率。事实上,中国企业目前在海外市场IPO几乎都是采取国际配售和公开发行两者 相结合的方式,而且国际配售的比例一般远大于公开发行。雨润食品的发行中,国际配售的比例为90%,公开发行比例仅为10%。而永乐家电原定的国际配售和 公开发行的股份比例也分别为90%和10%,后由于公开发行股份获得134倍认购,永乐家电修正发行比例,将面向散户投资人的发行比重从10%提高到 50%。因此,IPO要想获得成功,在国际配售部分获得海外投资机构的认可至关重要,有摩根士丹利、高盛作为战略投资人的项目显然有着很强的示范效应。
   除此之外,作为全球知名的投资银行,摩根士丹利、高盛也往往“毫不避嫌”地为旗下基金所投资的项目担当上市保荐人、  全球协调人等。摩根士丹利就出任 了永乐家电项目的上市保荐人;在雨润食品的上市中,高盛担当了上市保荐人和全球协调人。国际大行的这种投资部门和上市保荐部门的紧密合作机制,也是其投资 项目上市成功率的重要保证。
  正因为如此,再加上鼎晖广泛的本土人脉关系,使得“鼎晖+国际投行”的组合能够较多地介入雨润食品、永乐家电等Pre-IPO项目。而“傍”上摩根士丹利、高盛,鼎晖也等于是为自己的投资上了一份“保险”。
  “两头在内”,鼎晖欲成国内股权投资市场“大玩家”
  基金规模限制盈利总额,看好全流通转向国内资本市场
   资料显示,鼎晖从中金公司独立出来后,共募集了1.02亿美元的美元基金和3亿元的人民币基金。这些基金中还包括了几个从中金公司接手过来的投资项目, 因而,鼎晖实际操作后实际可利用的资金额度要比这个数额小。自鼎晖成立至2005年底,其新投资的项目有蒙牛乳业、李宁体育、永乐家电、山东山水集团、分 众传媒、雨润食品等8个(速达软件是鼎晖接手中金公司直接投资部的项目),平均而言每个项目的投资额度最多只有1.4亿元(约1740万美元)。
   这也就不难理解鼎晖在几个成功项目中的投资比例、收益与摩根士丹利、高盛相比均相差甚远。香港联交所公告资料显示,在蒙牛乳业的投资中,摩根士丹利的投 资额度是鼎晖的3倍多;在李宁体育的投资中,鼎晖的投资额度也不到联合投资的新加坡政府投资公司的1/4;在永乐家电的投资中,其投资额度更是只有摩根士 丹利的1/6。投资额相对较小,自然导致鼎晖的获利总额远远低于其他联合投资伙伴。
  这对任何投资人来说,无疑都是一种“隐痛”。
   能做大项目、成为股权投资市场“大玩家”的机会出现了。2005年下半年,鼎晖中国成长基金II募集完成,共募集了3.1亿美元。而此时,也适逢股权分置 改革基本尘埃落定,中国证券市场正迎来全流通时代。2006年上半年,鼎晖联合高盛收购了双汇集团100%的国有法人股、双汇发展第二大股东海宇投资持有 的25%双汇发展股份,并与华润集团联合重组央企华源集团。这表明,在全流通大背景下,一直通过项目海外上市实现退出的鼎晖将退出的场所转向国内。
  收购双汇:不用考虑退出渠道的投资
  收购双汇一案,对于鼎晖这家私募股权投资基金来说,划不划算只是一方面的问题,更关键的是双汇发展的A股上市公司地位以及全流通的大背景,使得其今后的退出畅通无阻。
   为了收购双汇集团、双汇发展相关股权,据公告资料,高盛策略投资(亚洲)有限责任公司和鼎晖Shine有限公司按国际惯例专门在香港成立项目公司罗特克 斯有限公司(以下简称罗特克斯),注册资本金为15亿港元,高盛持有51%的股权,鼎晖持有49%股权。高盛策略投资(亚洲)有限责任公司于2005 年12 月8 日在美国特拉华州注册成立,高盛集团拥有100%的股权;而鼎晖Shine 有限公司是2006 年2 月27 日在英属维京群岛注册成立的商业公司,鼎晖中国成长基金II 拥有100%的股权;鼎晖中国成长基金II 的组织形式也是有限责任合伙,无限合伙人全面负责该基金的管理,对该基金有完全的经营管理权,鼎晖中国成长基金II 的无限合伙人是鼎晖中国成长基金控股有限公司(在北京、上海、深圳均未查到该公司的相关工商注册纪录,它可能是指在开曼成立的CDH China Holdings Company Limited)。
  2006年4月28日,双汇发展公告,罗特克斯以20.1亿元的代价竞拍获得漯河国资 委持有的双汇集团100%的股权,从而间接持有双汇发展35.72%的股份。2006年5 月6 日,罗特克斯又与双汇发展第二大股东海宇投资签署了股份转让合同,海宇投资以562186083.87元的价格将所持有的双汇发展25%的股份全部转让给 罗特克斯。如果转让得到相关管理部门的批准,那么最后罗特克斯将持有双汇发展50.72%的股份(图3)。


  按持有罗特克斯49%的股权比例计算,鼎晖在此收购案中的投资金额约12.6亿元,超过了其过去4年所有项目的投资总额。
   更值得关注的是,鼎晖和高盛在股改锁定期后可随时通过A股市场退出。事实上,目前罗特克斯持有双汇发展31180.5万股股份,按2006年7月19日双 汇发展每股31.17元的收盘价计算,其持股市值已高达97亿元,远远高于收购成本25.72亿元。按双汇发展目前的10送2的股改方案,送股后罗特克斯 仍持有27145万股股份,市值仍达84亿元以上,即使股改方案变成10送3股,其持股市值也达78亿元,仍是其收购成本的3倍。尽管由于双汇集团还有一 些非上市资产的亏损难以估计,但其总资产额为21亿元,由此可以看出,鼎晖和高盛的这单买卖几乎可以说是稳赚不赔了。
  重组华源:打造中国私募股权投资第一品牌
  而在国资委直属国企中国华源集团有限公司(以下简称华源集团)的重组中,鼎晖不仅担当投资人,而且与华润集团共同进行重组工作。目前,鼎晖的执行总裁焦震已担任华源集团管委会副主任。
   据悉,鼎晖于2006年2月收购了华源集团原第三大股东金夏投资,进而间接持有华源集团股份,成为其第三大股东。根据为外界所知的重组方案,鼎晖收编除 国资委外其他华源小股东所持存量股权,华润接手国资委所持华源集团股权,然后再通过增资扩股方式最终实现对华源70%的控股,鼎晖的最终持股比例为30% (表3)。


  按华源集团总注册资本90669.6万元、原始股的转让价和增资扩股的价格约为每股0.9元计算,鼎晖接手原小股东股份的代价约为6.73亿元(不包括收购金夏投资的代价)。
   华源集团是中国最大的医药企业集团和纺织企业集团,资料显示,2004年华源集团实现主营收入485亿元,按国家统计局公布的统计结果,中国华源以营业 收入4,946,116万元列中国前1000大企业第29位,列2004年上海市百强企业集团销售排行榜第三位;按行业统计,列医药制造业第一位和纺织业 第一位;在中国出口额最大的200家企业中,排名28位。华源集团拥有全资和控股子公司11家,在2005年中国制药工业百强排序中,其旗下的上海医药位 居榜首,双鹤药业跻身第十位。
  尽管目前外界对华源集团的资产状况还存在种种质疑,但据华源集团长达10年的资深顾问、和君创业研究咨询有限公 司执行董事长李肃介绍,华源集团上世纪90年代中后期从地方政府手中收购了大量的存量资产,这些资产重新估值应该很可观。其后华源集团收购上海医药、北京 医药集团等行内领先企业,也是依据净资产来估价的,这些企业的渠道等特殊的价值都没有被计算进去。从这个角度来说,以前的这些收购十分划算。
   事实上,华源集团前一个重组方—诚通控股2005年开展的尽职调查显示,华源集团账面净资产为25亿元。但截至2005年9月20日,华源集团合并财务报 表的银行负债为251.14亿元,其中子公司为209.86亿元,母公司为41.28亿元。母公司短期银行借款34.05亿元,政策性长期贷款7.23亿 元。其中,医药方面,华源制药由于受国际VC价格下调的影响,亏损面比较大,但华源医药业务的总利润仍有70多亿元,负债只有40多亿元。
  而且,在华源集团重组中承担主要责任的是最终持股70%的华润集团,因此对鼎晖而言,参与华源集团的重组是得名又得利的买卖,既树立了品牌形象,承担的风险相对又较小。
   目前,华源集团拥有6家上市公司—华源股份(600094、900094)、华源发展(600757)、*ST源药(华源制药,600656)、上海医 药(600849)、凯马B(900953)、双鹤药业(600062),也可能为鼎晖现在投资的北京慈济健康体检连锁机构等相关企业提供退出渠道。
  准备着陆?
   在2005年上半年以前,鼎晖主要投资领域集中在传统行业,而且侧重于Pre-IPO项目的投资。2005年下半年,鼎晖完成II期私募股权基金的募 集,仍然主要专注于传统行业的投资。与此同时,投资分众传媒的巨大成功可能也是鼎晖加大在TMT(指融合高科技、传媒、电信)领域投资的重要原因, 2006年初鼎晖募集了一只额度为1.5亿美元的创业投资基金(表4)。据相关人士透露,这只基金也是在开曼群岛注册的有限合伙基金,普通合伙人有从 IDG出来的王功权、王树以及陈文江等6人。来自清科集团的资料显示,鼎晖创投基金一成立就已投资了奇虎网、华道数据等4个项目,总投资金额约8000- 9000万美元。


  从这两只基金涵盖的宽泛的投资领域看,鼎晖的意图是想打造一个综合性的投资机构。
  以前“两头在外”—即资金来源于海外、退 出也在海外市场的鼎晖,目前已利用全流通的环境打通了国内资本市场的退出渠道,更值得关注的是,增加了有限合伙相关内容的《合伙企业法》修订草案已于 2006年6月第二次提请全国人大常委会审议,这一修订案一旦通过,鼎晖以其以往的业绩,可以很容易地在国内找到有限合伙人,募集人民币基金,最终实现 “两头在内”—资金来源国内、退出也在国内。届时鼎晖投资项目的退出对境外资本市场的依赖度将大为降低。从另一个角度看,以鼎晖为代表的国内私募投资基金 因为对本土企业认识更加深刻、具有独到的发现项目的能力,反而可能获得更好的业绩,成为国际大投行所依傍的对象。
  从整个环境看,“《合伙企业 法》修订案一旦通过,中国私募投资基金必将正式采用有限合伙这一国际通行的私募基金形式,大行其道。”魏君贤律师认为,其时,中国本土私募股权投资基金必 将出现一次爆发性的增长,并在股权市场扮演越来越重要的角色。中国可望由此形成一个金字塔式的股权市场—以公众股权(上市公司)为顶、以私募股权基金为第 二层、以创业风险基金为第三层、以天使投资为底层。在本刊学术顾问、耶鲁大学管理学院金融经济学教授陈志武看来,正是这种完善的股权市场,形成了一套让人 们把未来的收入流通过证券化提前变现的机制,使得美国在过去的150年中一直是世界的创新中心。事实上,这种金字塔式股权市场以及类似国美收购永乐的并购 运作,正在从根本上改变中国创业者的商业模式,推动企业盈利模式由传统的靠现金流赚钱转变为卖企业价值赚钱。
  对于本文内容您有任何评论或补充,请发邮件至liling@p5w.net。(《新财富》2006年08月号最新文章)